Peter Nørlund writes:
> So many options, yet so little time :-)
Tis the world of digital bits we seem to thrive in.
--
Wes Hardaker
My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/
My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:14:30 -0800
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> Err, um, rant-off I guess :-)
Hehe, just to be clear, NET-SNMP is by far the best SNMP implementation
I've seen so far. I think the the problem lies in the design (and
usage) of the SMI, which probably can't be made truly pleasant (unless
Peter Nørlund writes:
> It seems that the better the API become, the more complex the
> underlying implementation becomes.
Yep, when you make APIs simpler that usually means you're doing a lot
more work under the hood. Unless you're getting reuse through that work
(which I'd argue you may be a
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:47:40 -0800
Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
> [catching up on past mail in mailing lists leaves me very behind in
> this discussion... Sorry about the delay.]
>
> > [...] I didn't feel comfortable
> > integrating Net-SNMP into the daemon, so I started o
[catching up on past mail in mailing lists leaves me very behind in this
discussion... Sorry about the delay.]
> [...] I didn't feel comfortable integrating
> Net-SNMP into the daemon, so I started out with a pure BIRD-based
> solution with an internal library used by
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:18:32 +0100
Peter Nørlund wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:10:04 +0100
> Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 04:58:13PM +0100, Peter Nørlund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have been working on adding SNMP support to BIRD through AgentX
> > > for a while, but
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:10:04 +0100
Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 04:58:13PM +0100, Peter Nørlund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been working on adding SNMP support to BIRD through AgentX
> > for a while, but unfortunately I haven't had the necessary spare
> > time the last many m
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 04:58:13PM +0100, Peter Nørlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on adding SNMP support to BIRD through AgentX for a
> while, but unfortunately I haven't had the necessary spare time the
> last many month, so it is far from done.
>
> Lately we've experiencing scalabili
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:44:14 +0800
k simon wrote:
>
> Netflow or Ipfix implemention in userspace is not scaleable, it will
> be good for implementing a wrapper in Bird for invoke ipt_netflow on
> Linux and ng_netflow on FreeBSD. But ng_netflow is limited for V9.
>
> Simon
Agree. Implementing
Netflow or Ipfix implemention in userspace is not scaleable, it will be good
for implementing a wrapper in Bird for invoke ipt_netflow on Linux and
ng_netflow on FreeBSD. But ng_netflow is limited for V9.
Simon
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 16:58:13 +0100
Peter Nørlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on adding SNMP support to BIRD through AgentX for
> a while, but unfortunately I haven't had the necessary spare time the
> last many month, so it is far from done.
>
> Lately we've experiencing scalability iss
Hi,
I have been working on adding SNMP support to BIRD through AgentX for a
while, but unfortunately I haven't had the necessary spare time the
last many month, so it is far from done.
Lately we've experiencing scalability issues with out SNMP collector
at work, and I stumbled upon sFlow, which s
12 matches
Mail list logo
