On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Maria Matějka wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Well, RFC 5575 doesn't explicitly say that the flowspec rule must
> contain the destination chunk, anyway it specifies that these rules
> should be understood as additional information for unicast BGP prefixes.
>
> Theref
Hi Maria,
thanks for your explanation. I recently stumbled over the mandatory dst
prefix when advertising a flow spec rule from a Juniper device which
filters just on the source address. But never mind, now as i know it, i
would add a dst prefix of 0/0 in case of source-only based filtering.
Regar
Hello!
Well, RFC 5575 doesn't explicitly say that the flowspec rule must contain the
destination chunk, anyway it specifies that these rules should be understood as
additional information for unicast BGP prefixes.
Therefore we assume that the dst is de facto mandatory, despite de iure it is
op
Hi,
does anybody know something about the behavior observed ?
Regards,
Alex
Original-Nachricht
Betreff:BGP session closed after receipt of flowspec route without
destination prefix
Datum: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 21:33:17 +0100
Von:Alex D.
An: bird-users@network.cz
