Thanks for all the info.
I was able to confirm that the RPKI refresh was causing my CPU issue. When I
remove it the CPU does settle after a few minutes (around 15-20 mins).
Looking forward to testing more of bird3!
Best regards,
François
> Le 4 avr. 2023 à 12:23, Maria Matejka via Bird-users
Hello, Francois!
Regarding 2.0.12, you just need to wait, loading 1.2M routes from 50
peers running 6x roa_check each is simply slow on one CPU. You may
ignore the debug log, there is typically nothing useful. Also thank you
for noting that the "reload burst split" message is still there; I
f
Hello,
I am currently trying bird out in a route collector scenario. We have around 50
devices all sending around 1.2M routes.
I initially started with bird 2.0.12, but the CPU it stuck at 100%, and the
debug logs has a lot of "channel reload burst split (max_feed=-1) ».
So I wanted to try bir
Any chance we'll see 2.0.10 or 3.0-alpha1 soon?
Em qua., 8 de jun. de 2022 às 11:18, Maria Matějka
escreveu:
>
>
> Hello!
>
> As there are some merges done, here is a short update.
>
> >3G. the current route attribute implementation is a two-layer mess
> originating in version 1 where everything
Hello!
As there are some merges done, here is a short update.
>3G. the current route attribute implementation is a two-layer mess originating
>in version 1 where everything was an IP route, let's squash these into one
>layer [IN PROGRESS]
Done (at least for now), will also comment the upda
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 12:07:48PM -0300, Douglas Fischer wrote:
> During your talk(on video) I thought that splitting conf files, mostly
> variables like prefix-list and AS-Path Regex that are unique by each peer,
> cloud be a way to reduce the workload of parsing configs on reconfiguration.
>
>
a) Could you please talk a bit more about the cgroups recommendation you
have made?
P.S.: I feel that this can be related to the use BIRD in
containers(maybe dockers) that I think can be a good future to BIRD.
Just a strong recommendation to make administrative measures to keep
yourself abl
Hello again Maria!
Sorry for the sliced talk.
I've just watched the video you posted! Congrats!
Watching that, I reminded of two topics that I feel to be relevant to
mention here.
a) Could you please talk a bit more about the cgroups recommendation you
have made?
P.S.: I feel that this can be re
Ooo!
I've read this 2 times... And it was a lot confusing to me!
I can't even imagine the day-to-day of dealing with it...
I will read that again in a couple of days and reprocess it.
Thank you very much for your big effort!
Em qui., 26 de mai. de 2022 às 17:52, Maria Matejka
escreveu:
>
Hello!
On 5/26/22 3:48 PM, Douglas Fischer wrote:
Hello all!
Any news from the front of version 3?
TL;DR: We're working on it, there is a lot of heavy lifting done and
another lot of heavy lifting still to be done.
You can also watch my RIPE 84 talk from last week here:
https://ripe84.ripe
Hello all!
Any news from the front of version 3?
Em qua., 2 de mar. de 2022 às 06:58, Ondrej Filip
escreveu:
> Dear BURD users,
>
> We have something special for you today. We're releasing a
> multi-threaded BIRD version 3.0-alpha0 for public testing. Protocols
> BGP, RPKI and Pipe got their ow
Hi,
just to share,
I migrated one of our BGP reflectors (v4/v6) to 3.0-alpha0
I have 658 EBGP Sessions UP
and 477 IBGP Sessions UP
Each with its respective in/out filter
Previously I used version 2.0.8 in this reflector
The configuration file remained the same, without any changes...
The ser
One question: What changes (if any) are necessary for the protocols to
run in multithreaded mode? I wouldn't mind taking a look at adding
support to the Babel protocol if you'd be interested in taking patches
at this stage?
Simply, almost none compared to other changes inside BIRD. One of my
Hello!
On 3/4/22 11:14 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Maria Matejka writes:
To make it crystal clear, 3.0 stable won't be much optimized in the
algorithmic or data structure way, this will happen later on. Anyway,
thank you for all your wishes.
One question: What changes (if any) are nec
Maria Matejka writes:
> To make it crystal clear, 3.0 stable won't be much optimized in the
> algorithmic or data structure way, this will happen later on. Anyway,
> thank you for all your wishes.
One question: What changes (if any) are necessary for the protocols to
run in multithreaded mode?
Hello!
There is also a blogpost about performance comparison we have recently
done between 3.0-alpha0 and 2.0.8 (the previous single-threaded
version) and you can read there also other articles about the
multi-threaded version.
… and here is the blogpost.
https://en.blog.nic.cz/2022/02/21/bir
On 2022-03-02 11:47, Maria Matejka wrote:
Hello!
On 3/2/22 10:53 AM, Ondrej Filip wrote:> We have something special for
you today. We're releasing a
multi-threaded BIRD version 3.0-alpha0 for public testing. [...]
There is also a blogpost about performance comparison we have recently
done be
Hello!
On 3/2/22 10:53 AM, Ondrej Filip wrote:> We have something special for
you today. We're releasing a
multi-threaded BIRD version 3.0-alpha0 for public testing. [...]
There is also a blogpost about performance comparison we have recently
done between 3.0-alpha0 and 2.0.8 (the previous s
Dear BURD users,
We have something special for you today. We're releasing a
multi-threaded BIRD version 3.0-alpha0 for public testing. Protocols
BGP, RPKI and Pipe got their own channels which promises faster
convergence and better usage of system resources. Version 3.0-alpha0
is based on the pre
19 matches
Mail list logo
