On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:30:12AM +, Zagorski, Michal via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi,
> Looks like our build from sources with reconfiguration failed on static
> routes config definitions.
> When configuring with ./configure --with-protocols="bgp static bmp pipe rpki"
> - static without bfd,
>
E,
BFD, MPLS)
--
Thanks,
Michał Zagórski
-Original Message-
From: Bird-users On Behalf Of Ondrej Filip
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2024 9:55 PM
To: bird
Subject: BIRD 2.15
Dear BIRD users,
we're releasing a new version 2.15. As usually, I am just a messenger, all
credits go to my colleag
, March 11, 2024 5:02 PM
To: Soha Jin
Cc: Soha Jin via Bird-users
Subject: RE: BIRD 2.15
Hello Soha,
Thank you. It works with 'ecmp off'.
One more thing I notice in Bird 2.15, is this warning message.
---
Kernel dropped some netlink messages, will resync on next scan.
ospfv3v6:
ospfv3v6`
will tell)
Regards,
Soha
From: Ilham Maulana
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 5:02 PM
To: Soha Jin
Cc: Soha Jin via Bird-users
Subject: RE: BIRD 2.15
�
Hello Soha,
�
Thank you. It works with 'ecmp off'.
�
One more thing I notice in Bird 2.15, is this warni
Hello Soha,
Thank you. It works with 'ecmp off'.
One more thing I notice in Bird 2.15, is this warning message.
---
Kernel dropped some netlink messages, will resync on next scan.
ospfv3v6: Unexpected case in next hop calculation
ospfv3v6: Cannot find next hop for LSA (Type: 2001, I
1.9]
dev wg-main
dev wg-main2
I am drafting a patch to fix it.
Regards,
Soha
--
From: Bird-users On Behalf Of Ilham Maulana
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 12:27 PM
To: Ondrej Filip ; Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users
Subject: Re: BIRD 2.15
Hello,
Af
Hello,
After upgrading to 2.15, OSPFv3 is broken. Previously working on 2.14. No
configuration changes.
This capture taken from router with Bird 2.15 installed.
OSPF route from router with Bird 2.15. it has ! sign.
birdc show route all 2a05:abcd:abcd:abcd
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:13:56PM +0100, Pim van Pelt via Bird-users wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> Thanks for the release! I was wondering about this one:
>o Static routes can have both nexthop and interface specified
> Could I not have already been able to set 'route 192.0.2.1/32 via
> 100.64.0.1%eth0 o
Hoi,
Thanks for the release! I was wondering about this one:
o Static routes can have both nexthop and interface specified
Could I not have already been able to set 'route 192.0.2.1/32 via
100.64.0.1%eth0 onlink' ? If this is different, can you share a canonical
syntax ?
By the way, the follow
Dear BIRD users,
we're releasing a new version 2.15. As usually, I am just a messenger,
all credits go to my colleagues:
Version 2.15
o BGP: Send hold timer
o BGP: New options to specify required BGP capabilities
o BFD: Improvements to 'show bfd sessions' command
o RPKI: New 'local addr
10 matches
Mail list logo