Ahoj Ondrej,
Thanks for your feedback. Finally I resolved it, it was firewall issue
locally on some defined bfd sessions; thus the Socket errors..
The thing is that last evening we had a flap on BFD sessions for no
apparent reason at only 3 BGP peers , on our 2 different Route Servers.
I was
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:48:19AM +0200, Irene Lalioti wrote:
> Hello dear community,
>
> I would like to pose a question regarding the error I receive concerning BFD
> : socket operation not permitted.
>
> The bfd is configured with multiplier 3; interval 300ms; idle tx interval 1
> sec;
Hi
C
Hello dear community,
I would like to pose a question regarding the error I receive concerning
BFD : socket operation not permitted.
The bfd is configured with multiplier 3; interval 300ms; idle tx
interval 1 sec;
Thanks a lot for your feedback in advance!
Irena
--
Irene Lalioti
Network E
Hello Community,
latest bird2-2.0.8 is now available from Debian bullseye-backports \o/
HOWTO get on Debian bullseye:
echo "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib"
>> /etc/apt/sources.list
apt update
apt -t bullseye-backports install bird2
Cheers,
Jakub Ružička
CZ.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:53:20AM +0200, Tiago Felipe Goncalves wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >From Bird doc:
> "BIRD offers crude automatic re-validating of affected routes after RPKI
> update, see option rpki reload.
> ...
> In contrast to to other filter operators, this status for the same route may
>
Hello,
I'm curious to understand how "Automatic channel reloads based on RPKI changes"
works, as I've noticed that after I enabled RPKI reload, the daemon is
constantly reloading the ingress policies/filters. I have set it up in the
laboratory and observed that the ingress policies/filters are
Awesome,
Thanks so much for your work here.
Any update on doing an upload of 2.0.8 to bullseye-backports?
Thanks,
Matt
On 9/8/21 06:27, Jakub Ružička wrote:
Hello Community,
latest bird2-2.0.8 is now available from Debian testing (and unstable) \o/
HOWTO get on Debian bullseye:
echo "deb h
oduces a s***load of logs, yet it should yield enough clues to
isolate the problem and find a suitable solution.
Thank you for your report!
Maria
On September 24, 2021 3:13:45 PM UTC, Andrew wrote:
Hi all.
I have Bird 2.0.8 on one of border routers, it runs with kernel 5.10.26
ould yield enough clues to isolate the problem and
find a suitable solution.
Thank you for your report!
Maria
On September 24, 2021 3:13:45 PM UTC, Andrew wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>I have Bird 2.0.8 on one of border routers, it runs with kernel 5.10.26
>and uClibc-ng 1.0.38. It acts as R
Hi all.
I have Bird 2.0.8 on one of border routers, it runs with kernel 5.10.26
and uClibc-ng 1.0.38. It acts as RR and receives FV from uplink + FV
from second border (also RR), and it has 2 routing tables (one which
receives BGP routes, then routes sinks to main table.
When second
I am looking for the party emoji - thanks a lot, Jakub!
Best regards from Switzerland,
Nico
Jakub Ružička writes:
> Hello Community,
>
> latest bird2-2.0.8 is now available from Debian testing (and unstable) \o/
>
> HOWTO get on Debian bullseye:
>
> echo "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian tes
Hello Community,
latest bird2-2.0.8 is now available from Debian testing (and unstable) \o/
HOWTO get on Debian bullseye:
echo "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian testing main" >>
/etc/apt/sources.list
apt update
apt -t testing install bird2
# TEST ALL THE THINGS
This can be backported into bulls
way to troubleshoot this?
The neighbor starting with 193. is a Debian 10 machine, 185 and
192.168.2.1 are EdgeOS running Bird 2.0.8.
2021-08-31 17:23:53 ospfv3_v4: Bad DBDES packet from nbr
192.168.2.1 on wg0 - I-bit mismatch (7)
2021-08-31 17:23:53 ospfv3_v6: Bad DBDES packet from nbr
193.x
Hello Community,
I've finally managed to upload bird2-2.0.8 into Debian experimental \o/
If you're waiting for official Debian BIRD packages, please consider
testing the experimental version and letting me know whether it worked
for you as expected.
tl;dr HOWTO test on Debian unstable (sid):
ec
After some digging it was kinda obvious, I copied the config from
another host where the interface was named `uplink` but on this node
it's enp3s0 so `protocol direct` didn't import any routes.
On 10.08.21 13:08, Tim Meusel wrote:
Hi,
I'm running bird 2.0.8 on Arch Linux:
Hi,
I'm running bird 2.0.8 on Arch Linux:
I would like to import local device routes and export them via BGP. My
assumption is that the direct protocol would be required here? My config
looks like this:
router id 192.168.178.35;
debug protocols all;
log syslog { debug, trace, info, r
Hi there,
Is it possible to add Debian Buster to the launchpad repo as well or
what's the current way I can install it on Debian without configuring
from source?
On 14/04/2021 16.02, Jakub Ružička wrote:
Hello BIRD Community!
Latest bird-2.0.8 is available from most current downs
Snipping to this, as it seems fishy:
> Output from the same router "router1.place6":
>
> bird> show babel neighbors
> babel1:
> IP addressInterface Metric Routes Hellos Expires
> fe80::21b:21ff:febc:bf36 bond0.896 8 12 0.000
> fe80::21b:21ff:febc:bfe0 bond0.8
. Just this moment I restarted bird on
router1.place10 and the IPv4 route 147.78.195.0/29 instantly pops up
again on router2.place6:
bird> show babel routes
...
147.78.195.0/29 147.78.195.227bond0.865535 + 1
51.477
...
This time however it took only seconds or a minut
96 1 1 0
> 2a0a:e5c0:1:8::/64 00:00:00:00:93:4e:c3:fb 0 2204 10 0
> 2a0a:e5c0:0:6::/64 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:2e 96 2 1 0
> 2a0a:e5c0:0:5::/64 - - 2 0
>
> The "funny&qu
0:00:00:00:00:00:00:2f 96 1 1 0
2a0a:e5c0:1:8::/64 00:00:00:00:93:4e:c3:fb 0 2204 10 0
2a0a:e5c0:0:6::/64 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:2e 96 2 1 0
2a0a:e5c0:0:5::/64 - - 2 0
The "funny&quo
Hello Skyler,
I'm glad you like the idea! There is currently no support for selecting
architecture for `apkg build`, but you can create source package (`apkg
srcpkg`) and build it using tool of your choice with correct parameters.
For bird-2.0.8 that would be:
apkg get-archive
apkg srcp
Actually, I found that one config file had statements which was not
ended correctly which resulted in wierd errors.
On 19/04/2021 12.30, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
Hi there,
Is it just me or does 2.0.8 bring breaking changes to config structure?
The following function does not appear to work any
Hi there,
Is it just me or does 2.0.8 bring breaking changes to config structure?
The following function does not appear to work anymore.
--
function prefix_is_bogon() {
if net.type = NET_IP4 then
if net ~ BOGONS_4 then return
re
> packages using apkg? Let's say if the host is x86_64 and we want to
> generate arm64 package with it?
>
> On 14/04/2021 16.02, Jakub Ružička wrote:
> > Hello BIRD Community!
> >
> > Latest bird-2.0.8 is available from most current downstream distro repo
Hello!
That sounds awesome, but how would we build different architecture
packages using apkg? Let's say if the host is x86_64 and we want to
generate arm64 package with it?
On 14/04/2021 16.02, Jakub Ružička wrote:
Hello BIRD Community!
Latest bird-2.0.8 is available from most cu
I could yes, but is that something other people would prefer?
On 14/04/2021 22.29, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
The Debian package I have been using actually does put the configs in
/etc/bird which makes sense, as it's basically a normal Debian in the
eyes of the package.
You /can/ make a pac
> The Debian package I have been using actually does put the configs in
> /etc/bird which makes sense, as it's basically a normal Debian in the eyes of
> the package.
>
>
You can make a package though, where everything lives under /config, preferably
/config/opt - right?
Like I said: Not a g
I get where you're coming from, but as the actual automated package
building for the EdgeRouter's is the goal, the building on the router
itself is not very nice way to say host a jenkins agent on.
The Debian package I have been using actually does put the configs in
/etc/bird which makes sens
Hej -
sorry for being late to the game (this thread), but $dayjob kept me busy - what
else is new...
I have been an avid user of BIRD (1.x and 2.x) on the Ubiquiti platforms - on
both major versions of "EdgeOS" and on both hardware platforms (Octeon →
MIPS-BE and "the other" → MIPS-LE (all E
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 11:45, Jakub Ružička wrote:
> https://launchpad.net/~cz.nic-labs/+archive/ubuntu/bird/
>
> I'm going to send 2.0.8 packaging update including link to the updated
> launchpad later today or tomorrow so extra points for you if you test it
> and let me know before that ;)
>
I
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:45:28PM +0200, Jakub Ružička wrote:
> Oh, I see! I checked history and this versioned requirement was added as
> part of "Bump the dephelper compatibilty level to 12" in Debian package
> which is a change specific to latest debian release. It's quite likely
> that this sp
patibility
> level) in order to work with unmodified system (without upgrading
> init-system-helpers from Backports). It worked without problems (with
> init-system-helpers >= 1.22~ requirement), but needed some modifications
> to Debian control files.
I've also carried out t
Hello BIRD Community!
Latest bird-2.0.8 is available from most current downstream distro repos
including:
* Arch
* EPEL/CentOS
* Fedora
* Gentoo
* Manjaro
* NixOS
* OpenBSD
You can use repology to get an overview:
https://repology.org/project/bird/versions
# Debian
Debian is currently in
On 4/14/21 11:22 AM, Justin Cattle wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Thanks for working on this.
My pleasure. After seeing how community has downstream packaging covered
(❤) and hitting some annoyances with OBS I decided I'm only going to use
OBS for SUSE builds only and use respective community systems for e
pstream packages on many different distros and
>> archs from shared packaging source.
>>
>> I already have bird2 packages built in a testing OBS repo for latest
>> Debian, Ubuntu, Fedoras, and CentOS but there are some remaining issues
>> with docs generation on older distr
to address.
> In worst case scenario I will temporarily drop doc packages in
> order to
> get bird built.
>
> I plan to announce the new OBS repos sometimes next week to provide
> Debian, Ubuntu, and hopefully SUSE packages as opposed to Ubuntu only
> thro
Hi guys,
Just posted the .dsc for Backports (buster) based on 2.0.7-4.1 for
acceptance review. Given discussion about the version freeze in Debian I
decided to await the outcome.
Cheers,
Kees
On 10-04-2021 11:00, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> Good news: I found a sponsor willing to backport BIRD2
And... if it all an option: https://salsa.debian.org/keesm as well... :-)
On 12-04-2021 16:08, Jakub Ružička wrote:
I don't have permissions to push into bird2 [salsa].
[salsa]:https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2
Ondřej agreed to me taking over bird Maintenance but he didn't give me
salsa pe
On 4/12/21 3:17 PM, Jakub Ružička wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 4/10/21 3:09 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Samstag, den 10.04.2021, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
>>> ❦ 10 avril 2021 11:00 +02, Kees Meijs | Nefos:
>>>
Over the weekend I'll try to further prepare a .dsc that gets thr
Hello,
On 4/10/21 3:09 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 10.04.2021, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
>> ❦ 10 avril 2021 11:00 +02, Kees Meijs | Nefos:
>>
>>> Over the weekend I'll try to further prepare a .dsc that gets through
>>> lintian.
>>>
>>> Formally only packages (an
Hey Kees,
On 4/10/21 11:00 AM, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Good news: I found a sponsor willing to backport BIRD2 in Debian.
Awesome, thanks for help!
I'll probably be able to do debian backports in the future once I'm more
faimilar with debian processes (so far I've only prepared
Hi,
Just FYI, I pushed it to the gentoo tree:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/20196
Alarig
On Wed 24 Mar 2021 07:03:57 GMT, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who is responsible for the Debian packages at the moment?
> I couldn't find the build scripts for those at gitlab.nic.cz and would
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 19:36, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> If you or
> someone could push that to testing before Debian 11 release, i would
> make a branch with important patches.
has it been considered _in the past_ to permanently adopt a branching
model for releases similar to how git-flow describes
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 06:22:40PM +0200, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Thank you for your reply and good work!
>
> Don't worry: I won't break protocol in terms of the freeze.
>
> For now I focus on the testing / unstable version that you commited for
> a backports basis.
Hi
I a
Hi Benjamin,
Thank you for your reply and good work!
Don't worry: I won't break protocol in terms of the freeze.
For now I focus on the testing / unstable version that you commited for
a backports basis.
Regards,
Kees
On 10-04-2021 15:09, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 10.04.2
I'm not sure, how would I check if it's LE or BE?
CPU info on ER-12:
---
system type : UBNT_E300
machine : Unknown
processor : 0
cpu model : Cavi
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 02:46:25PM +0300, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
> Please also keep in mind that they do not run normal Debian, but EdgeOS
> which is a fork of vyatta which uses Debian.
Several years ago, i run original Edgerouter (ERLite-3) with vanilla
Debian, just with kernel from EdgeOS.
>
Sorry for the multiple replies in short period of time, but forgot to
mention that some EdgeRouters do run on different architecture.
EdgeRouter-X is the cheapest of the bunch, and it runs mipsel if I
remember right. Someone can correct me, but it also has very low RAM,
~256MB-512MB.
EdgeRout
Please also keep in mind that they do not run normal Debian, but EdgeOS
which is a fork of vyatta which uses Debian.
On 10/04/2021 14.44, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
Stuck on Debian stretch, 64-bit.
4.9.79-UBNT #1 SMP Wed Oct 28 16:51:13 UTC 2020 mips64 GNU/Linux
On 10/04/2021 14.42, Ondrej Zaji
Stuck on Debian stretch, 64-bit.
4.9.79-UBNT #1 SMP Wed Oct 28 16:51:13 UTC 2020 mips64 GNU/Linux
On 10/04/2021 14.42, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:33:34PM +0300, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
Hi,
Reference: https://wiki.debian.org/MIPSPort
Hi
BTW, we thought about adding som
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:33:34PM +0300, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reference: https://wiki.debian.org/MIPSPort
Hi
BTW, we thought about adding some Edgerouter or similar hardware to our
CI pool, as it seems to be the only reachable big-endian machine. What is
the state of Debian on the
g degrees of
success - he seems very busy so I'm dropping him from CC. I haven't
contacted others, yet. I'll focus on taking over Debian package
maintenance as soon as bird-2.0.8 is available from upstream repos.
The repo you link is the official source of bird2 Debian packaging
On 09-04-2021 12:02, Jakub Ružička wrote:
> I've tired to contact Ondřej several times with varying degrees of
> success - he seems very busy so I'm dropping him from CC. I haven't
> contacted others, yet. I'll focus on taking over Debian package
> maintenance a
c packages in order to
>> get bird built.
>>
>> I plan to announce the new OBS repos sometimes next week to provide
>> Debian, Ubuntu, and hopefully SUSE packages as opposed to Ubuntu only
>> through Launchpad.
>>
>> However, after seeing your interest in the Launchpad repo, I'll see if I
>> can get it updated as well to make the transition smoother.
>>
>>
>> I have bright plans for both upstream and downstream bird packaging but
>> I'll share the them only after I'm done with bird-2.0.8 packages you've
>> been waiting for.
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your patience!
>>
>>
>> Jakub Ružička
>> CZ.NIC packager 📦
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hey Kees,
thanks for your kind words, I'm happy to help!
I've tired to contact Ondřej several times with varying degrees of
success - he seems very busy so I'm dropping him from CC. I haven't
contacted others, yet. I'll focus on taking over Debian package
maintenance
On 4/9/21 9:52 AM, Robert Scheck wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2021, Jakub Ružička wrote:
>> I already have bird2 packages built in a testing OBS repo for latest
>> Debian, Ubuntu, Fedoras, and CentOS but there are some remaining issues
>> with docs generation on older distro versions which I need to add
I think that's a great idea and in fact I've been working on an
integration with apkg the automation packaging tool I'm developing in
order to allow easy packaging - you can see the changes here in my branch:
https://gitlab.nic.cz/jruzicka/bird/-/tree/apkg
A single new distro/ directory includes:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2021, Jakub Ružička wrote:
> I already have bird2 packages built in a testing OBS repo for latest
> Debian, Ubuntu, Fedoras, and CentOS but there are some remaining issues
> with docs generation on older distro versions which I need to address.
> In worst case scenario I will tempora
t; get bird built.
>
> I plan to announce the new OBS repos sometimes next week to provide
> Debian, Ubuntu, and hopefully SUSE packages as opposed to Ubuntu only
> through Launchpad.
>
> However, after seeing your interest in the Launchpad repo, I'll see if I
> can get it up
as well to make the transition smoother.
I have bright plans for both upstream and downstream bird packaging but
I'll share the them only after I'm done with bird-2.0.8 packages you've
been waiting for.
Thank you for your patience!
Jakub Ružička
CZ.NIC packager 📦
st in the Launchpad repo, I'll see if I
can get it updated as well to make the transition smoother.
I have bright plans for both upstream and downstream bird packaging but
I'll share the them only after I'm done with bird-2.0.8 packages you've
been waiting for.
Thank you for your patience!
Jakub Ružička
CZ.NIC packager 📦
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 04:55:15AM +0200, Jakub Ružička wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been recently tasked with updating Debian and Ubuntu bird packages
> and I'm probably going to maintain all bird packaging (including Debian
> downstream) from now on as I do with Knot DNS and Knot Resolver packages
Ubuntu only
through Launchpad.
However, after seeing your interest in the Launchpad repo, I'll see if I
can get it updated as well to make the transition smoother.
I have bright plans for both upstream and downstream bird packaging but
I'll share the them only after I'm done with b
line-dev libssh-gcrypt-dev linuxdoc-tools-latex m4 opensp quilt
texlive-latex-extra xsltproc build-essential
#Clone from debian Gitlab
mkdir bird2
cd bird2
#Download current release (didn't get the ftp uscan working)
wget https://bird.network.cz/download/bird-2.0.8.tar.gz
gbp clone
Urgent targets in my case are amd64, mips64el/mips64 at least.
On 08/04/2021 11.08, Justin Cattle wrote:
We are pretty much exclusively amd64 here.
The current ppa pkg list looks like this however: amd64, arm64, armhf,
i386, ppc64el
I guess the Debian maintainers will be keen to keep parity,
lease (didn't get the ftp uscan working)
wget https://bird.network.cz/download/bird-2.0.8.tar.gz
gbp clone --pristine-tar https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2.git
cd bird2
#Import new upstream version
gbp import-orig ../bird-2.0.8.tar.gz
#Generate changelog entry
gbp dch
git add debian/c
❦ 8 avril 2021 11:00 +02, Peter Hurtenbach:
> Below are my steps I've done to import the new upstream version and
> build the package with git-buildpackage on a Debian Buster machine (or
> chroot).
A simpler alternative:
apt install git-buildpackage pristine-tar pbuilder
DIST=buster git-pbui
Agreed. That's why I'll put effort in updating the original Salsa and go
for backports.
On 08-04-2021 10:07, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
> I'm trying to avoid using a PPA for it, but I will setup a CI for the
> package when I do get it working without dep issues.
We are pretty much exclusively amd64 here.
The current ppa pkg list looks like this however: amd64, arm64, armhf,
i386, ppc64el
I guess the Debian maintainers will be keen to keep parity, but I
presume they have some infra for each of those targets.
Cheers,
Just
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 08:57, K
I'm trying to avoid using a PPA for it, but I will setup a CI for the
package when I do get it working without dep issues.
On 08/04/2021 10.47, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
I completely agree. Very likely it's just downloading
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2/ and replace where needed and
iss
In addition: I'll set up a build environment and test with amd64
(x86_64) at least.
What other architectures are "urgent" targets?
On 08-04-2021 09:47, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> I completely agree. Very likely it's just downloading
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2/ and replace where need
I completely agree. Very likely it's just downloading
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2/ and replace where needed and
issue dpkg-buildpackage or alike.
K.
On 08-04-2021 09:45, Justin Cattle wrote:
> The source packages are in the PPA, so it should be pretty easy to
> just bump the upstream an
The source packages are in the PPA, so it should be pretty easy to just
bump the upstream and changlog then rebuild, as a starting point.
Cheers,
Just
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 08:09, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> It seems I found a Debian developer to sponsor me at the time but that
Hi again,
Just contacted Ondřej Surý and Benjamin Drung (he did the last commit)
about helping out to bump https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2/ to 2.0.8.
In parallel asked the backports list about adopting BIRD2 in Debian
Backports.
To be continued...
Regards,
Keee
On 08-04-2021 09:06, Kees
Hi again,
It seems I found a Debian developer to sponsor me at the time but that
didn't go through. I'll give it another try.
Cheers,
Kees
On 08-04-2021 09:00, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> I would like to help as well. In September 2019 I contacted Ondřej
> Surý about releasing BIRD2 via Debian B
Hi,
I would like to help as well. In September 2019 I contacted Ondřej Surý
about releasing BIRD2 via Debian Backports (a prerequisite is having it
in testing in the beginning).
Not sure what happened (very likely I am to blame myself, but it's been
a while...) but the contact stopped at some poi
I would love to be able to use the Debian packages, but those take quite
a lot of time to get, it seems like. It would also help if the
gitlab.nic.cz generated packages for mips64 and mipsel Debian as well.
Could someone tell me all of the Debian packages I need to be able to
build it? It comp
I'm just trying to decide whether to create our own 2.0.8 packages or not.
It would be fairly trivial, but it's always nicer to track upstream
people via distro if possible, and so it just comes down to time scales for
us.
Do we have any feeling for how long it may take for packages to appear in
h
Hello List!
On 3/21/21 11:57 PM, Ondrej Filip wrote:
o Filter: Optimized redesign of prefix sets
I was asked to inform you that this also means dropping the possibility
of mixed IPv4 / IPv6 prefix sets. As for v2.0.8, it is forbidden to use
both address families in one prefix set.
We su
Hi,
Thank you for pointing me to the right place, but it seems that it wasn't as
straightforward as I had hoped to get a deb out for 2.0.8. It's unable to find
some docs related perl nodule?
Where should I make a request for CI/CD build of mips64/mips Debian package?
That would be really us
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:33:40PM +0100, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 20:39, Peter Hurtenbach
> wrote:
> > You can take a look at the Debian Git repository:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2
>
> I suppose the CI/CD script is "slightly" outdated...
> https://salsa.d
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 20:39, Peter Hurtenbach wrote:
> You can take a look at the Debian Git repository:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2
I suppose the CI/CD script is "slightly" outdated...
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2/-/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml (No
mention of FreeBSD 12, Debi
Hi,
You can take a look at the Debian Git repository:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bird2
Regards,
Peter
On 3/24/21 6:03 AM, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
Hi,
Who is responsible for the Debian packages at the moment?
I couldn't find the build scripts for those at gitlab.nic.cz and would
like
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:03:57AM +0200, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who is responsible for the Debian packages at the moment?
> I couldn't find the build scripts for those at gitlab.nic.cz and would
> like to get them so I can setup mips64 and mipsel architecture deb builds.
Hi
Debian p
Hi,
Who is responsible for the Debian packages at the moment?
I couldn't find the build scripts for those at gitlab.nic.cz and would
like to get them so I can setup mips64 and mipsel architecture deb builds.
Best regards,
Skyler
On 22/03/2021 9.32, fatal wrote:
> Hey,
>
> thanks for the new rele
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 07:51:00PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >> Never mind, I found that I should also read the notes :D
> >> Notes:
> >>
> >> Automatic channel reloads based on RPKI changes are enabled by default,
> >> but require import table enabled when used in BGP import filter.
>
❦ 23 mars 2021 19:02 +01, Ondrej Zajicek:
>> Never mind, I found that I should also read the notes :D
>> Notes:
>>
>> Automatic channel reloads based on RPKI changes are enabled by default,
>> but require import table enabled when used in BGP import filter.
>> Looks like this did the trick
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 06:34:09PM +0100, Stefan Plug wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Never mind, I found that I should also read the notes :D
> Notes:
>
> Automatic channel reloads based on RPKI changes are enabled by default,
> but require import table enabled when used in BGP import filter.
> Looks
Hi all
Never mind, I found that I should also read the notes :D
Notes:
Automatic channel reloads based on RPKI changes are enabled by default,
but require import table enabled when used in BGP import filter.
Looks like this did the trick!
Thanks again for the awesome work!
--
Stefan Plug
Hi all,
Thank you all for the hard work!
I was just testing this in the lab for:
o Automatic channel reloads based on RPKI changes
Which to me sounds like we do not have to do “birdc reload in all” anymore
whenever ROAs change, but it doesn't seem to work for me yet :(
Am I wrong in thinking t
Thanks a lot for the new release!
I’ve upgraded a RR and a router, the build and the restart didn’t hit
any issue so far.
Cheers,
--
Alarig
Hey,
thanks for the new release, looking forward especially to the RPKI reload!
Atm it seems like the debian repo is broken (even though 2.0.8 not being
there yet as Skyler pointed out):
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository
is not updated and the previous in
Hello!
When should there be a new Debian package built for it?
Best regards,
Skyler
On 22/03/2021 0.57, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> Hello!
> I have great news for you! My colleagues did a fantastic job and after
> a while we can present a new BIRD release - 2.0.8. Here is a list of
> changes:
>
> o
On 22. 03. 21 0:26, Robert Scheck wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Ondrej Filip wrote:
So please test it, run it and write your feedback!
I'm sorry, but it looks like an old mistake [1] slipped in again:
My fault, please reload the source again. :-(
Ondrej
+ ./configure --build=x86_64
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> So please test it, run it and write your feedback!
I'm sorry, but it looks like an old mistake [1] slipped in again:
+ ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/u
Hello!
I have great news for you! My colleagues did a fantastic job and after
a while we can present a new BIRD release - 2.0.8. Here is a list of
changes:
o Automatic channel reloads based on RPKI changes
o Multiple static routes with the same network
o Use bitmaps to keep track of ex
Hey guys,
Any news on the 2.0.8 release?
Regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Plug
Network Engineer (EU)
Phone: +49 160 2504854
ECIX, a Megaport company
PEERING GmbH
Tauentzienstraße 11
10789 Berlin Germany
Office: +49 30 233 24 16-0
Web: www.ecix.net
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Germany. Registerge
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 06:42:42PM +0200, Piotr KOWALCZYK wrote:
> Dear BIRD IRD developers,
>
> Could you please tell us when do you plan to release next 2.0.8 version?
Hopefully this or next month. I have some backlog of things to finish,
but definitely want to do the release soon.
--
Elen si
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 18:42, Piotr KOWALCZYK wrote:
> Could you please tell us when do you plan to release next 2.0.8 version?
> There were 0 updates this year and I wonder if this will happen this year?
> Approximate release date would be nice
Looking at the old mail thread
https://bird.network.
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
