Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:09:08AM -0700, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any feedback on this?
>
> Hi
>
> Although i agree that we should have better ways to control BIRD
> programmatically, this feature seems to me like too sp
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:09:08AM -0700, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any feedback on this?
Hi
Although i agree that we should have better ways to control BIRD
programmatically, this feature seems to me like too specific and too
bizarre.
I see at least two alternatives already awailabl
On 07/28/2016 07:09 PM, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any feedback on this?
>
> I didn't follow up with a reply because the argument presented against
> was a straw man fallacy followed by a slippery slope. I realize that I
> could very well encode a boolean in 134 characters as in the ex
rd Pendzik :-)
-Original Message-
From: Bird-users [mailto:bird-users-boun...@network.cz] On Behalf Of João
Taveira Araújo
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:09 PM
To: Israel G. Lugo
Cc: bird-users@network.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Gate boolean protocol options on filename.
Hi,
Any feedback on this?
Hi,
Any feedback on this?
I didn't follow up with a reply because the argument presented against
was a straw man fallacy followed by a slippery slope. I realize that I
could very well encode a boolean in 134 characters as in the example
provided, but would rather signal that through the presence
On 24-05-2016 19:36, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Israel G. Lugo
> wrote:
>>
>> But that is still the case in your approach... The file being present
>> dictates whether or not the configuration is valid (does what you want).
>
> If the file is not prese
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Israel G. Lugo
wrote:
>
> Personally, I don't really like this feature very much.
That's fine, I personally don't like RIP and don't feel obliged to use it...
> On 24-05-2016 14:29, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
>> That's what we do now, and it sucks. You still
Personally, I don't really like this feature very much.
On 24-05-2016 14:29, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
> That's what we do now, and it sucks. You still end up with embedding
> BIRD syntax outside of BIRD. If you use no wildcards in the include
> statement, the file must always be present otherwi
That's what we do now, and it sucks. You still end up with embedding
BIRD syntax outside of BIRD. If you use no wildcards in the include
statement, the file must always be present otherwise the config is
invalid, so you now shifted the responsibility of managing "disabled
on|off" statements elsewhe
Hi,
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 04:50:12PM -0700, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
> Toggling session parameters currently requires editing the configuration
> file and reloading BIRD. Doing so programatically requires keeping up
> with the syntax and layout of a particular configuration.
>
> This commit i
Toggling session parameters currently requires editing the configuration
file and reloading BIRD. Doing so programatically requires keeping up
with the syntax and layout of a particular configuration.
This commit introduces an alternative method for gating configuration of
boolean protocol propert
11 matches
Mail list logo
