On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 12:24:07PM +0200, Tim Weippert via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> just a quick question, should bird2 announce type 2 prefixes
> in this state?
>
> i do some tests with an FRR EVPN network and add one bird2 evpn node. I
> receive evpn routes and see them in the appro
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 01:00:40PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 08:18:18AM +0200, Daniel Suchy via Bird-users wrote:
> > > There's internet draft describing in deta
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 02:29:42PM +, chan alfie wrote:
> The default ospf ASE will be set as rts_ospf_ext2, how to change it, and set
> the ospf ASE as rts_ospf_ext1?
Hi
Set ospf_metric1 route attribute in export filters.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 08:18:18AM +0200, Daniel Suchy via Bird-users wrote:
> There's internet draft describing in detail, why it's not a good idea to
> store RPKI validation state inside community variables at all..
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp-0
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:29:44PM -0500, Jay Hanke via Bird-users wrote:
> Has anyone implemented lab or production IPv4 next hops over an IPv6
> only IX vlan with BIRD as the route server?
>
> I'm interested to hear your experiences. Specifically router vendor interop.
Note that there is an Eur
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 04:38:47PM +0200, Erin Shepherd wrote:
> I guess it might not fit with bird's abstractions (or perhaps the Babel
> protocol), but has thought been given to using SO_TIMESTAMPING to have the
> kernel compute TX/RX timestamps?
Yeah, that is definitely a better solution.
-
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:22:01PM +, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> Not sure I undersand, these are the IPs of this router itself:
>
> ```
> root@gw0:~ # ifconfig vlan600
> vlan600: flags=1008843
> metric 0 mtu 9000
> description: backbone
>
> options=1c680703
>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:10:05PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Arzhel,
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:57:38AM +0200, Arzhel Younsi wrote:
> > But for IPv6, it's cleaner to only require the router's link local address:
> > testvm2006:~$ ip -6 addr
> > inet6 2620:0:860:140:10:192:24:4/128 scope
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:25:12AM +, Pisilä Janne via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The password protocol option section in user's guide 2.0
> https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc&v=20&f=bird-3.html#proto-pass
> incorrectly shows date format as dd-mm- when it should be -mm-dd in
> BIRD
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 02:48:11AM +, chan alfie wrote:
> rt3
> ```
> rt3# bird -c /etc/bird/lab/rt3.conf -p
> bird: /etc/bird/lab/rt3.conf:173:1 ASBR must be in non-stub area
> ```
> does it mean this router is an ASBR? but this router only connect to rt4. and
> does not contain static route,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:26:45PM +0100, Jim Hague via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While building a Buildroot project, I ran into an occasional Bird build
> failure. In a parallel make environment, nest can try to write proto-build.c
> to objdir/nest before that directory exists. I think this
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:54:48PM +0200, Pim van Pelt via Bird-users wrote:
> Hoi Ondrej, Bird users,
>
> TL/DR: Ondrej's patch works and allows Bird to use OSPFv3 with either
> completely unnumbered interfaces, where it 'borrows' a valid IPv4 address
> from a loopback device. It does so without
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Pim van Pelt wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> On 4/5/24 15:23, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > I have almost implemented 'extended next hop' for OSPFv3. But then i
> > pivoted to supporting properly IPv4 loopback nexthop [*]. Now i have
> > doubts about usefulness of 'extended
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 11:49:21PM +0200, Pim van Pelt via Bird-users wrote:
> Hoi Ondrej,
>
> On 02.04.2024 16:40, Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users wrote:
> > Although one could have option that forces it to interpret as IPv6, i
> > would prefer to have 'extended next
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:08:35AM +, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was reading the ospv3 spec and this link
> https://networklessons.com/ospf/ospfv3-for-ipv4- and was wondering if such
> features is supported in bird 2. Can we announce loopbacks via OSPFv3 and
> remove the
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 11:49:21PM +0200, Pim van Pelt via Bird-users wrote:
> Hoi Ondrej,
Hi
> On 02.04.2024 16:40, Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users wrote:
> > Although one could have option that forces it to interpret as IPv6, i
> > would prefer to have 'extended next hop
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 11:34:43AM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Babelers,
>
> I've just come across a reason I'd want to run babel with both bird and
> babeld on the same node and have them become neighbours. The details are
> tedious -- my usual disclamer applies ;)
If you want to have both
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:14:51PM +0200, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> > Sebastian - my interpretation of 5838 is slightly different, and I don't
> > think it expressly forbids xAF nexthops:
> > > 2.5: Although IPv6 link local addresses could be used as next hops for
> > > IPv4 address families, it is
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Inrin via Bird-users wrote:
> Hiho,
>
> I noticed that `birdc show route export ` after a `configure soft`
> shows the state with the new export filter, even if no update ocurred.
> The PCAP also shows, as long as no external update comes in, no updates
>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:57:23PM +0100, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
> For BIRD 2, we extrapolated that to show at most one table per network type.
> These design choices are always some kind of looking for equilibrium – if
> you have 1K+ tables, you typically don'ŧ want to dump them all.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:05:04PM +, Elmar K. Bins via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> we're running 2.14 on FreeBSD 13.3 (out of the current bird2-2.14 pkg).
>
> A long time ago we set up RPKI feeds that put their routes into tables
> r4 and r6.
>
> I've just added a second RPKI sourc
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 08:50:22AM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Just upgraded and got:
> ...
> Downgrade to 2.14 solved problem.
>
> Is there fix for this or workaround?
Hello
There are two issues, both caused by commit
31aa62ae6d2e111e87c08b4b27a16ead968f0689:
1) BIRD could gene
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 02:51:50PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> 19.03.2024 13:15, Soha Jin пишет:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have found the problem (inherit next hop from a pointopoint router)
> > and already drafted a patch. I will post the patch to the list once I
> > have tested it.
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:57:22AM +, Mazur, Dariusz via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello Bird Users,
> I am trying to implement RTBH (Remotely Triggered Black Hole) in below setup:
>
> 0.Simplified Topology:
>
> * ebgp fabric
> * inside fabric we use only IPv6, so we announce IPv4 blocks wi
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:27:34PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed in the new version 'show bfd sessions' was extended with
> 'all' option. But I also noticed that in case of 'show protocols',
> 'show ospf state|topology' this option comes before [name], but f
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:30:12AM +, Zagorski, Michal via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi,
> Looks like our build from sources with reconfiguration failed on static
> routes config definitions.
> When configuring with ./configure --with-protocols="bgp static bmp pipe rpki"
> - static without bfd,
>
Hello
Recently, we made a beta release of EVPN support in BIRD:
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/tree/evpn
(branch 'evpn' in BIRD git repository)
You are welcome to try it and give us your feedback and suggestions.
The primary documentation is still missing, but there are comprehensive
exampl
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:13:56PM +0100, Pim van Pelt via Bird-users wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> Thanks for the release! I was wondering about this one:
>o Static routes can have both nexthop and interface specified
> Could I not have already been able to set 'route 192.0.2.1/32 via
> 100.64.0.1%eth0 o
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:15:32PM +0900, Nico Schottelius via Bird-users wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> after switching over to the following filter, as mentioned in the last
> mails:
>
> filter static_and_bgp_and_ospf {
> if(source = RTS_STATIC || source = RTS_BGP || source = RTS_OSPF) then
>
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:04:07PM +0100, Marcel Menzel via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am running the new MPLS L3VPN feature for quite a while now, and it's
> working without issues so far for me, but I have one question:
>
> I set "add paths on;" on my iBGP peer template in all SAFIs
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 02:13:11PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 11.01.2024 13:29, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > You mean exporting to the kernel? You can alter the routes in input
> > filters. Or pipe routes to another table, altering them in the pipe export
> > filter, and then
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:25:10AM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> Nick Cao via Bird-users writes:
>
> Sorry for missing this earlier, but it looks like with your patch bird
> will no longer honour the "wires" or "wireless" setting at all? Which
> will break old configs, so
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:18:36PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> I have a setup as in the attached drawing. I can see that the bird ABR
> node (R2) sets the E-bit and the B-bit in the router LSA. The B-bit seems
> correct as it is the ABR, but it is not an ASBR.
Hi
It depends on config. if route
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:28:27AM +0200, Garri Djavadyan via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I noticed that the legacy Bird version behaves strangely while it is in
> an enhanced route-refreshing process, but I am not sure whether it is a
> known/expected behaviour for version 1.6.8. Name
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:07:09AM +0200, Martin Vystrčil via Bird-users wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> is there any possibility to be notified on network update. We are using bird
> to manage BABEL in our product (embedded system).
>
> Main usage would be to send SNMP notification on BABEL network u
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:59:47AM +0100, Mihai via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the same server I am running two BIRD processes each configured with OSPF
> and iBGP (toward the same neighbors, using different local addresses).
> Should BFD for iBGP work on both processes?
> In my case all BFD s
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:04:52AM +, Saklak, Marcin via Bird-users wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have an issue with onlink static routes bird constantly remove and add
> > them to kernel.
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:04:52AM +, Saklak, Marcin via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an issue with onlink static routes bird constantly remove and add them
> to kernel.
>
> Is this expected behavior that for ipv6 onlink route bird after each scan
> time remove and add route? for other s
gt; On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:44 AM Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:47:03AM +, Mazur, Dariusz wrote:
> > > Hello Ondrej,
> > > Thanks for quick response. Additional option to ignore link-local BGP
> > > next ho
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:47:03AM +, Mazur, Dariusz wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
> Thanks for quick response. Additional option to ignore link-local BGP next
> hops would help us a lot.
Hello
Done, here is a commit with BGP channel option 'next hop prefer global',
which makes BIRD to use global n
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 07:43:56PM +0200, Bernd Naumann via Bird-users wrote:
> On 2022-10-07 18:32, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Does the pppoe-wan have link-local address range? Does BIRD know about it?
> > What is What is the output from BIRD command 'show interfaces'?
> >
>
> I assume no. Like
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 11:29:33AM +0200, Bernd Naumann via Bird-users wrote:
> Update:
>
> I would ratter prefer to understand why bird is unable to pick up the ipv6
> default route on this pppoe device.
Hi
Does the pppoe-wan have link-local address range? Does BIRD know about it?
What is What
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Bernd Naumann via Bird-users wrote:
> I may should have had a look at the log before :/
>
> ```
> Thu Oct 6 09:32:51 2022 daemon.err bird: KRT: Received route ::/0 with
> strange next-hop fe80::f6cc:55ff:fe42:1a94
> ```
>
> But why is this a strange a ne
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 04:20:51AM +0200, Olivier Benghozi via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently using RIP/Ripng with md5 auth with some Cisco/Juniper and
> Quagga gears.
> I'm looking to switch from quagga to Bird(2).
>
> I would have a feature request about the RIP MD5 sequence numbe
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 07:07:58PM +0200, Marek Küthe via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is the right place to ask my question:
>
> I used bird2.0.10 (from debian backports) since some time I get the
> message "Netlink: No route to host", however in the bird log it does
> not specify
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:22:10PM +0900, 안상혁 via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have encountered some issues using bird 1.6.8
>
> there are two issues :
>
> 1) sometimes bird looks like doesn't handle neighbor's bgp keepalive
> messages.
It is good idea to check which are effective keepaliv
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:18:48PM +, Milovancevic, Nemanja via Bird-users
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Since some of our customers have devices which are not supporting EBGP
> add-path capability, I was wondering would there be an option that BIRD
> announces also other “not only best” paths, sin
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 09:13:55AM +0100, Ian Chilton wrote:
> Hi Barry!
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, at 6:08 PM, Barry O'Donovan (INEX) wrote:
> > As you're running Bird 2.0.8 this should be no longer necessary. Per
> > 2.0.8's release logs:
> > > Version 2.0.8 (2021-03-18)
> > > o Automatic channe
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:38:59PM +, mukund via Bird-users wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We are using bird version 2.0.9. We have IXIA traffic which is sending 16K
> OSPF routes to our App which we send to Bird. Issue is seen when we restart
> our App. As part of our restart app handling, we restart
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 01:23:28PM +, Mazur, Dariusz via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
> In my setup I have iBGP session with peer , and I learn v6 route. It is iBGP
> so we have 2 next hops global and link-local. By default bird uses link-local
> when route is exported to kernel. Is there any c
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 09:32:31AM +0200, Tore Anderson via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to garbage collect unused dynamic BGP neighbours?
Hi
i think that 'configure' CLI command should remove unused dynamic BGP
instaces as a side-effect of its unused protocols cleanup code, even if
51 matches
Mail list logo
