Anno domini 2024 Ponikierski, Grzegorz via Bird-users scripsit:
Hi,
> Am I blind (possible) or Bird doesn’t show if route is eBGP or iBGP? If it
> shows it, then can you please help me to see it?
I don't think there is an indication whether a route was learned
locally via iBGP or eBGP. Dependin
Hi,
Anno domini 2023 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 01:43:02PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> > Anno domini 2023 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
> > [...]
> > > I hope it does not break some multipoint tunnels like Wireguard, they
> > > often
Hi,
Anno domini 2023 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
[...]
> I hope it does not break some multipoint tunnels like Wireguard, they
> often have bad flags reported by kernel, but they should be configured as
> PtMP anyways.
I disagree on the PtMP part.
I've deliberately set up a bunch of Wireguard tunn
Hi Maria,
Anno domini 2023 Maria Matejka via Bird-users scripsit:
> > * RIPE 87 in Rome, November 27 to December 1.
> >
> We got approved a tutorial on Monday Nov 27 morning (9 am). If you're
> interested in details about BIRD 1 EOL, how to migrate to BIRD 2 and how to
> optimize your configur
Hi,
Anno domini 2023 Nico Schottelius via Bird-users scripsit:
I'm not totally sure what the NH issue is as I'm not fully following
topology and configuration, however OSPF on Wireguard interfaces works
with bird (at least v1.6):
[...]
> As the wireguard interface seems to be unusable with OSPF
Anno domini 2021 Lukas Haase scripsit:
Hi,
> Assume the following toy example:
>
> R1: R2:
> 10.1.1.0/24 <--- 10.1.1.1, 192.168.1.1 <-> 192.168.1.2, 10.1.2.1 --->
> 10.1.2.0/24
>
> Net 10.1.1.0/24 has R1 as default route, net 1
Anno domini 2021 William scripsit:
> Hi All,
> As an experiment I moved the IPs from the VLAN sub-interfaces on each node
> to the parent bond interface and put that in the VRF... and it works.
> Due to the ESXi test environment and the vswitches not supporting traffic
> with 802.1q tags I had u
Anno domini 2021 Kenth Eriksson scripsit:
> > > Correct, when I configured a LL address on the loopback interface it is
> > > picked up by bird. But does that make sense? A stub interface does not
> > > send packets, so why does it need a LL address?
>
> > Not really. It is just an unintended r
Anno domini 2020 Robert Sander scripsit:
Hi,
> I have the task to configure BIRD to be able to announce a more specific
> prefix temporarily to our BGP peers.
>
> Currently we announce a /22 and want to be able to flip a switch and
> announce one /24 from that /22.
>
> As we partition the netwo
Anno domini 2018 Kurt Wauters scripsit:
Hi,
> I recently started playing with BIRD and was wondering if i can run
> multiple BIRD instances on the same machine but the route selection should
> happen per instance and not accross instances.
>
> Basically i want to setup different RS on the same m
Anno domini 2018 Thiruvazhiyan Lakshmanan scripsit:
Hi,
> When I tried to add " ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 encap mpls 100 via inet
> 10.10.101.1" I get "Error: either "to" is duplicate, or "encap" is a garbage."
>
> root@ubuntu4-4-VM1:/proc/sys/net# ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 encap mpls 100
Anno domini 2018 Wilhelm Schuster scripsit:
> On 2018-04-27 21:47, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> > This way it's easy to have different direct protocols in bird and
> > easily tag, filter and/or announce prefixes within your network
> > accordingly. real loopback IPs
Anno domini 2018 Wilhelm Schuster scripsit:
Hi,
> Can you give a scenario where I would want to use multiple dummy's
> instead of just adding/removing addresses to the loopback interface? I
> can't use a dummy interface for "real" packet processing since it just
> drops the packet. If the use cas
Anno domini 2018 Julien Sansonnens scripsit:
Hi,
> I'm having a hard time trying to peer with some router over GRE tunnel. I'm
> using bird 1.6.4
> I have many GRE tunnels and BGP sessions is working fine on all of the them
> except one.
>
> Session is locked on "Idle" state.
> Here are my logs:
Anno domini 2018 t a scripsit:
> Thank you for the quick response. What we are looking to do is assign a
> single label to routes when they are placed into a kernel table via a pipe.
> For instance:
>
> protocol pipe master_to_kernelTable{
> table kernelTable;
> peer table mas
Anno domini 2018 Michael Schwartzkopff scripsit:
Hi,
> I want to set up a gre tunnel between two routers that speak BGP. bird
> exports the learned route to the kernel with "via":
I'm not sure what you are trying to do here.
Are the two routers already speaking BGP (eBGP / iBGP?) without the
GR
Anno domini 2018 Mike Neo scripsit:
Hi,
> could you tell me what is the best practice for sysctl.conf configuration
> (2 or 3 bgp peers, possible asym routing)?
What exactly are you looking for?
The first things that come to mind would be
* forwarding enabled
Old style: global option:
Anno domini 2017 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
Hi,
> We plan to to release 2.0 during this year, mainly with features that are
> already in pre1, and some minor additions (like IPv4 in Babel, IPv4 in
> OSPFv3, VRFs, microsecond timers, ...).
Do you mean VRFs in the sense of Linux VRFs [0]? Like being
Hi folks,
I've just seen in the NEWS for bird 2.0.0-pre1 that there are many
MPLS related things coming. Kudos for that!
Forgive me if this has been answered recently, I didn't find anything
in my list archive:
As of the available support for MPLS forwarding in the Linux kernel,
I'm wondering if
Anno domini 2017 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:41:22AM -0400, Damien Clabaut wrote:
Hi,
> > Remains my second question, how can I handle the case where the prefix-set
> > is empty ?
>
> No, that is not possible. BIRD needs an item in set to see which kind
> of set it is
Anno domini 2017 ico scripsit:
Hi,
> I would like to hear some advices about bird on linux, what is the best way
> to inject some route into OSPF on bird. I want for my router to announce via
> OSPF to other routers that some IPs should be directed to it.
>
> Example: I want IPs 10.0.0.1/32 and
Anno domini 2017 Darren O'Connor scripsit:
Hi,
> I currently use the unix socket to communicate with bird. the issue is that
> the data I get back is unstructured text. I have quite a bit of code
> parsing all that data into usable structs.
>
> Would it not be possible to add the ability to requ
Anno domini 2017 Quentin Ritoul scripsit:
Hi,
> I'm starting to use Bird, and I try to redistribute loopback in ospf. (So
> it seems easy...)
[...]
> Below the configuration of rt01 and rt02 :
>
> rt01 :
>
> filter loopbacks {
> if (net = 10.99.99.1/32 ) then accept;
> else re
Anno domini 2017 Damien Clabaut scripsit:
Hi,
> Is there any way to declare a list of interfaces in a string set or
> something ?
>
> The goal would be to use it in direct protocol, and in pipe protocol (import
> where ifname ~ list_if1)
How 'bout managing the list of devices within the direct
Hi,
I'm working on a (Freifunk) network setup based on Linux and Bird
using an OSPF/iBGP configuration which basicly works like a charm.
Now I have some setups where multiple prefixes are configured on a
node either for connected networks or for some anycasted ressources.
To be able to enable/dis
Anno domini 2016 Ondrej Filip scripsit:
Hi Ondrej, *
> a new version of the 1.6.x branch is out:
>
> Version 1.6.3
> o Large BGP communities
Awesome!
> o BFD authentication (MD5, SHA1)
> o SHA1 and SHA2 authentication for RIP and OSPF
> o Improved documentation
> o Several bug fixes
Anno domini 2016 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Alexander Morlang wrote:
Hi,
> This behavior is mostly defined by appropriate OS distribution package
> tools and package configuration, not by BIRD itself.
[...]
> I don't really see that there is any signific
Anno domini 2016 Tim Weippert scripsit:
Hi,
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:52:20PM +0200, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> > Dear users,
> > a new version of the 1.6.x branch is out:
>
> Nice job.
Indeed.
> But on one of my environment Bird 1.6.1 immediately segfaults. I tried
> both the provided Debian pa
Anno domini 2016 Anton Kiryushkin scripsit:
Hi Anton,
[...]
> As I think, on the first server I discard any announce from second server
> and conversely. But on both servers I see both servers as neighbors. Where
> I'm wrong?
You seem to have confused routes and OSPF adjacencies. You filter out
Anno domini 2016 Anand Buddhdev scripsit:
[...]
> and the following in bird6.conf:
>
> protocol static dropall {
> preference 50;
> route ::/0 blackhole;
> }
[...]
> However, it doesn't appear to have worked for IPv6 (yes, I reloaded bird6):
>
> # ip -6 route show table 10 | fgrep defau
Anno domini 2016 tomas.hlava...@nic.cz scripsit:
Hi Tomas,
> And regarding Debian question from the another mail: Yes, I am
> actually running Debian on my prototype board. I simply created
> debootstrap image and put it to the eMMC. The only difference is a
> custom kernel with dozen patches (we
31 matches
Mail list logo
