++ would be happy to meet too.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Martin Mares wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Although i am not an atendee of IETF 99, i am in Praha and i would be
>> glad to meet with BIRD users atending IETF 99. If there are more
>> interested people, we could make a common meeting.
>
> I am
Hi,
I've run into a bug which manifests itself during reconfiguration.
Unfortunately, the bird config in question is extremely large and I
can't easily cut it down to something replicable. I'm running into
this particular issue in bird6, but have no reason to believe IPv4
would fair any better. Al
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:09:08AM -0700, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any feedback on this?
>
> Hi
>
> Although i agree that we should have better ways to control BIRD
> programmaticall
sence of a file.
Cheers,
- j
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Israel G. Lugo
wrote:
>
> On 24-05-2016 19:36, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Israel G. Lugo
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But that is still the case in
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Israel G. Lugo
wrote:
>
> Personally, I don't really like this feature very much.
That's fine, I personally don't like RIP and don't feel obliged to use it...
> On 24-05-2016 14:29, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
>> That&
00 AM, Baptiste Jonglez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 04:50:12PM -0700, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
>> Toggling session parameters currently requires editing the configuration
>> file and reloading BIRD. Doing so programatically requires keeping up
>> with the synta
Toggling session parameters currently requires editing the configuration
file and reloading BIRD. Doing so programatically requires keeping up
with the syntax and layout of a particular configuration.
This commit introduces an alternative method for gating configuration of
boolean protocol propert
Hi,
I'm running into a difference in behaviour between bird and bird6,
although admittedly it may come from netlink itself. I'm using bird
1.5.0, but have also tried with build from latest git head.
Assume a connection to an upstream router over a link addressed with
10.0.0.0/31 or ::0/127 fo
rder of BGP updates.
One way of solving this is to batch route changes by delaying route
injection, otherwise the route churn is too high and linux starts
doing a lot of nexthop invalidation when you inject multiple full
routing tables into the FIB.
Cheers,
- j
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:04 PM, João
In our hack around this we (Fastly) ended up adding a bgp_rte_same
with pretty much everything you mention.
One non-obvious addition is that we ended up enforcing that the
multipath entry had the same next AS, i.e bgp_get_neighbor(new) ==
bgp_get_neighbor(old). With nothing else to tie break, we'd
10 matches
Mail list logo