Re: BGP update schedule problem

down. get him down off the list for repetitive violation of mail lists ethic. On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 15:24, Mattia Milani wrote: > Up > > Il giorno dom 3 feb 2019, 11:11 Mattia Milani < > mattia.mil...@studenti.unitn.it> ha scritto: > >> up >> >> Il giorno mer 30 gen 2019 alle ore 23:34 Mattia Mi

Re: Bird OSPF bug? (Mutliple areas, rfc1583compat off, cost ignored)

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 02:14, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 02:07:52PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote: > > I have test lab -- two OSPF routers, Bird 1.6.4: A, B. > > > > 2 areas defined: 0.0.0.0, 0.0.0.1. Export "all". > > > > When rfc158

Re: [ABCD/01][2019/01/26] Re: Default config file name 1.6 vs. 2.0

I can suggest changing it so: bird 2 would try to open new config file, say, bird2.conf and only if there's no such a file, would fall back to bird.conf. -- End of message. Next message?

OSPF, BSD: every additional IP on an interface gives another neighbour

The docs say: "... secondary switch On BSD systems, older versions of BIRD supported OSPFv2 only for the primary IP address of an interface, other IP ranges on the interface were handled as stub networks. Since v1.4.1, regular operation on secondary IP addresses is supported, but disabled by defau

Bird OSPF bug? (Mutliple areas, rfc1583compat off, cost ignored)

I have test lab -- two OSPF routers, Bird 1.6.4: A, B. 2 areas defined: 0.0.0.0, 0.0.0.1. Export "all". When rfc1583compat is Off I observe default route gets propagated via area 0.0.0.1 in despite its interfaces have higher costs than area 0.0.0.0's have. Turning rfc1583compat On changes it to

A few suggestions for docs improvement

First of all, protocols description are better kept in separate HTML pages otherwise it's hard to find by some keywords that several protocols have. It's really inconvenient to loose focus when you search something related to OSPF and Find scrolls page to completely different protocol. Second: why

OSPF transmit delay is not documented?

Whereas it's given in some default Bird configs, I couldn't find it in manual. -- End of message. Next message?

Bird handles OpenBSD route priority differently

(compared to native OSPF daemon.) Test lab: just two routers with OSPF on both: A and B. OpenBSD 6.4. Bird 1.6.4p1. Router A has two default routes installed: Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface default192.168.69.36

UHb (broadcast) routes get into OSPF database on OpenBSD 6.4

I have an instance of Bird 1.6.4 on a freshly installed OpenBSD 6.4. My study of its OSPF database shown (with birdc show ospf lsadb self) that there were LSAs for broadcast routes that are indicated as ones having "UHb" in netstat -rn output. I suspect they're added by "protocol direct", but didn

Re: Does repeated config timeout work as single (first one) accumulated?

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 02:31, Igor Podlesny wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 02:25, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38:11AM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote: > > > Or would the second "config timeout" commit version 2 instead and when > > >

Re: Does repeated config timeout work as single (first one) accumulated?

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 02:25, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38:11AM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote: > > Or would the second "config timeout" commit version 2 instead and when > > timeout is reached would rollback from version 3 (which is equal by >

Re: Do filters support accessing properties of some interfaces?

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 01:35, Maria Jan Matějka wrote: > On January 16, 2019 5:34:36 PM GMT+01:00, Igor Podlesny > wrote: >> >> -- Is it possible to get link status (up/down? anything else?) of an >> interface (specified by interface name or other reference way if >

Does repeated config timeout work as single (first one) accumulated?

IOW, let's say we have config version 1. Then if config has been changed (become version 2) and temporarily applied with config timeout 10 and then before it's been rolled back (assuming control still isn't lost of course), entered config timeout 30 would it be effectively the same as i

Do filters support accessing properties of some interfaces?

-- Is it possible to get link status (up/down? anything else?) of an interface (specified by interface name or other reference way if there're any) for further use in routes' preferences/metrics calculations? Hi :) -- End of message. Next message?