ot be found.
>
> In my opinion the explicit http request should not be automaticaly
> rewriten to https.
>
> Adam Pribyl
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan
--
Chris Boot
bo...@boo.tc
uperseded by "protocol direct", at least that's what I
use for my OpenVPN routes.
HTH,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@boo.tc
e (0)
> > Options [External]
> > Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 0.0.0.0, Priority 1
>
> --
> Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
>
> Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org
> <mailto:sa
means and end up with a different value that is
nonetheless still correct.
The documented means of validating the checksum as specified in RFC 905
B.4 is to calculate c0 and c1 from the unchanged contents of the packet,
which must result in a zero value to be considered valid.
Signed-off-by: Chris
Hi folks,
On 25 Apr 2015, at 16:35, Chris Boot wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I’m running bird6 1.4.5-1 (from Debian jessie) on my home network. Quite
> regularly I see floods of "Received bad lsa checksum” message in my syslog on
> the two routers that run BIRD, wh
BIRD
complains about.
Has anyone here run into this before?
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@bootc.net