Hi,
I have the following configuration:
```
define ospf_v4_routes = [
198.19.0.0/16
];
filter ospf_export {
if (net.type = NET_IP4 && ! (net ~ [ 0.0.0.0/0 ])) then reject;
accept;
}
filter ospf_import {
if (net.type = NET_IP4 && net ~ ospf_v4_routes) then accept;
reject;
}
protocol ospf v2 os
:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:22:01PM +0000, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> > Hi Ondrej,
> >
> > Not sure I undersand, these are the IPs of this router itself:
> >
> > `root@gw0:~ # ifconfig vlan600 vlan600:
> > flags=1008843 metric 0 mtu
> >
yes; };
interface "vlan600" {
type ptp;
cost 15;
bfd off;
};
};
}
```
Benoit
On Monday, April 15th, 2024 at 01:12, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed latest bird 2.15.1 with ntet link support on Freebsd and I
> contunuously get the following messages:
>
Hi,
I have installed latest bird 2.15.1 with ntet link support on Freebsd and I
contunuously get the following messages:
```
2024-04-14 23:09:12.386 ospfv6: Bad packet from fe80::f89b:80ff:fe06:d7f9
via vlan600 - my own router ID (0)
2024-04-14 23:09:12.386 ospfv4: Bad packet from 198.19.4.33
e "vlan200" {
type ptp;
cost 10;
};
};}
```
Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia
—
t. +33608655490
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
On Sunday, March 31st, 2024 at 01:42, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I get the same result as well. On freebsd when starting I a
I get the same result as well. On freebsd when starting I also get this message
" Cannot find next hop address".
Benoît
On Saturday, March 30th, 2024 at 16:04, Pim van Pelt via Bird-users
wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> On 3/30/24 15:50, Pim van Pelt wrote:
>
>> OSPFv3 adjacency did establish, but no route
Hi everyone,
I was reading the ospv3 spec and this link
https://networklessons.com/ospf/ospfv3-for-ipv4- and was wondering if such
features is supported in bird 2. Can we announce loopbacks via OSPFv3 and
remove the need to use OSPFv2 and ptp subnets ?
I see it as a good opportunity to redu
t from R2 to R1. Please look at things like these:
> show route all
> show route all export
> show route all protocol
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024, 00:21 Benoit Chesneau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I have an issue witth the route import onbetwee
Hi all,
I have an issue witth the route import onbetween two machine. They are
connected to each others by a vlan and at each end ana /31 is setup. I can
ping between each end.
R1: VLAN330(1.1.1.1) > R2 : VLAN330(1.1.1.2)
R2( 1.1.1.2) is connected to upstreams transit and collect cor
disregard . I misread the first slide :)
benoît
Le mer. 24 janv. 2024 à 11:54, Benoit Chesneau
<[beno...@enki-multimedia.eu](mailto:Le mer. 24 janv. 2024 à 11:54, Benoit
Chesneau < a écrit :
> this is pretty cool. Will it works on freebsd as well?
>
> benoît
>
> Le mer.
this is pretty cool. Will it works on freebsd as well?
benoît
Le mer. 24 janv. 2024 à 11:10, Ondrej Zajicek
<[santi...@crfreenet.org](mailto:Le mer. 24 janv. 2024 à 11:10, Ondrej Zajicek
< a écrit :
>> > On Jan 16, 2024, at 20:02, Pim van Pelt via Bird-users
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hoi Maria,
Hi,
Is there a way to send an admin shutdown for one connection only? Should i add
a `graceful shutdown on the prodtocol and do a soft configure?
Benoît
This would be interresting to compare to FreeBSD performance .I wonder if DDPK
on on FreeBSD worth it. Are people still using freebsd on networking platforms?
It seems that even Bird support is lagging behind linux support sometimes.
Benoît
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, August 24
iday, June 16th, 2023 at 12:23, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> After doing more testing onf Freebsd 13.2 , bird 2.13:
>
> When 1.1.1.1/31 and 1.1.1.2/31 are set on the vlan interface, bird correctly
> announce them as the next hop.
>
> However when 1.1.1.1/32 and 1.1.1.2/32 are
---
On Friday, June 16th, 2023 at 09:49, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I first posted this issue on the freebsd ml but it's probably more an issue
> to post there.
>
> I have the loopbacks `1.1.1.1` and `1.1.1.2` of 2 nodes distributed using
> OSPF:
> `filter ospfexport {
) [ASXXX]
via 10.3.1.1 on vlan2212
```
Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia
—
t. +33608655490
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, June 16th, 2023 at 09:49, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> I first posted this issue on the freebsd ml but it's
I first posted this issue on the freebsd ml but it's probably more an issue to
post there.
I have the loopbacks `1.1.1.1` and `1.1.1.2` of 2 nodes distributed using
OSPF:
```
filter ospfexport { if (source = RTS_DEVICE) then accept;
reject;
}
protocol ospf v2 { tick 2;
ipv4
ther route-reflector as well.
>
>
> The recipe that I most often see being used for this type of scenario is to
> have 2 Route-Reflectors in different geographic positions, positioned in such
> a way as to be OFF-Path, thus trusting the IGP, and each one of them peering
>
For redundancy I am thinking to have a router reflector per pop . Each route
reflector would peer with each others. The issue is that since each POP has a
transit, i have duplicate route and sometimes a loop is created. How can it be
prevented?? I tried to put them in the same cluster but it doe
Hi all,
What I am trying to achieve is to connect to remote peers using information
found in fib1 routing table setup in freebsd and export / import routing
information in this table using BGP. The issue I have right now is that this
configuratin doesn't work. It can't connect to the remote A.B
20 matches
Mail list logo
