Errata:
s/Tigera/CyberArk Labs/g
I misread the sources. Thanks to Santiago for correcting me.
Maria
On 3/10/23 00:09, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
Hello!
In fact, I think that Tigera should have never submitted this CVE as it
makes not sense at all. Adding the fact that nobody from T
Hello!
In fact, I think that Tigera should have never submitted this CVE as it
makes not sense at all. Adding the fact that nobody from Tigera has ever
reached to us regarding this CVE, this simply isn't a legit CVE.
I'll submit a request to reject this CVE. Thank you for pointing to it.
Mar
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, Ondrej Filip wrote:
On 09. 03. 23 5:14, William wrote:
On 09/03/2023 13:41, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176483, Red Hat pointed
me today to CVE-2021-26928.
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26928
contains
Hi,
I allow myself to jump on this discussion.
That CVE report is about attacking a kubernetes cluster running Calico
(see the link in the `References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools`
section in the NIST CVE). By default, calico doesn't require password
authentication for BGP connections.
