On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 07:19:50PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> This is an implementation of draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability-02.
> It's implemented since quite some time for FRR and in datacenter, this
> gives a nice output to avoid using IP addresses.
>
> Currently, it is always enabled. T
❦ 3 février 2021 21:27 +01, Job Snijders:
> I recommend adjusting the patch in such a way that the capability is
> only exchanged with specific neighbors where the capability has been
> explicitly enabled through neighbor/group specific configuration.
Yes, I'll do that. I am also OK with the pa
Dear Vincent,
Thank you for your contribution, running code always is an excellent way
to move specifications for the purpose of interopability forward.
I'd like to comment on my favorite topic... *** DEFAULTS :-)
On Wed Feb 3 19:19:50 CET 202, you wrote:
>
> However, maybe the capability s
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:09:53PM +, Muzalewska, Klara wrote:
> Hi,
> In which order prefixes are displayed while doing :
> “show route table ” ?
Hi
We use hash tables internally to implement routing tables, so routes are
reported in order they are in the hash table (i.e. sorted by hash valu
This is an implementation of draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability-02.
It's implemented since quite some time for FRR and in datacenter, this
gives a nice output to avoid using IP addresses.
Currently, it is always enabled. The hostname is retrieved from
uname(2) and not configurable. The domain na
Hi Jay,
On 2/3/21 2:22 PM, Jay Hanke wrote:
Is it possible to output the BIRD route table in JSON format from birdc?
BIRD doesn't have any build in support for generating JSON, but there are
two projects for using regular expressions for parsing birdc output:
https://github.com/alice-lg/birdw
Jay Hanke writes:
> Is it possible to output the BIRD route table in JSON format from
> birdc?
Nope...
-Toke
Is it possible to output the BIRD route table in JSON format from birdc?
Jay
Hi,
In which order prefixes are displayed while doing :
“show route table ” ?
While doing this command with this same set of prefixes, it will always display
in this same order?
Best regards,
Klara