On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 06:13:44PM +0300, Дружок 1 wrote:
> Hello, All!
>
> I have two bird2.0.7 process run in same Linux system:
>bird
>bird6 (copy of sbin/bird)
> It used two different config files.
> In each config describes protocol bfd
> But I need that process “bird” unbind own bfd
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:26:59PM -0500, David Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to see if bird can accomplish the following and so far I can't
> seem to find a way to do it.
>
> Quick summary:
> I want to be able to modify a route (the actual IP/mask) between 2
> interfaces.
>
>
> Setup is
On 22.01.2021, 04:39, "Ondrej Zajicek" wrote:
> Thanks, fixed:
Works like a charm! Thanks for fix :-)
Piotr
Hello!
This is currently not possible. There are some thoughts how to make it
possible, yet never finished and implemented.
Maria
On January 22, 2021 9:26:59 PM GMT+01:00, David Johnson wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to see if bird can accomplish the following and so far I
>can't
>seem to find a way
Hi,
I'm trying to see if bird can accomplish the following and so far I can't
seem to find a way to do it.
Quick summary:
I want to be able to modify a route (the actual IP/mask) between 2
interfaces.
Setup is as follows:
table A: routes learned as normal
table B: I want to advertise a specif
Дружок 1 writes:
> Hello, All!
>
> I have two bird2.0.7 process run in same Linux system:
>bird
>bird6 (copy of sbin/bird)
> It used two different config files.
> In each config describes protocol bfd
> But I need that process “bird” unbind own bfd from v6 address, and process
> “bird6”
Hello, All!
I have two bird2.0.7 process run in same Linux system:
bird
bird6 (copy of sbin/bird)
It used two different config files.
In each config describes protocol bfd
But I need that process “bird” unbind own bfd from v6 address, and process
“bird6” - from v4 address (conflict).
How
Yep Ondrej!
This L2/L3 redundancy layer would not be addressed by the Bird itself...
Would be a solution composed by Bird(or even other Engines) and some other
tools.
I brought this suggestion here because I believe that here are the most
interested in this possible solution.
Perhaps one of the
The big difference is the single point of failure.
With a host doing that redirection, We will have load balancing and
different boxes(physically different) running multiple instances.
But We will still suffer from single-point-of-failure.
To solve that, We will need another layer of redundancy o
