Re: OSPF v3 DR - intra-area-prefix LSA generation

2020-11-16 Thread Bala Sajja
Thanks Ondrej. Regards, Bala. On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 9:08 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 07:03:13PM +0530, Bala Sajja wrote: > > I am running bird 2.0.7. Seeing issue with respect to ipv6 address > > add/delete on DR. This added/deleted ipv6 address prefix convergence is

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] nest: Add Blake2s and Blake2b hash functions

2020-11-16 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:31:14PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > > > @@ -169,6 +170,12 @@ const struct mac_desc mac_table[ALG_MAX] = { > >[ALG_SHA256] = HASH_DESC("Keyed SHA-256", sha256, SHA256), > >[ALG_SHA384] = HASH_DESC("Keyed SHA-38

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] nest: Add Blake2s and Blake2b hash functions

2020-11-16 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > @@ -169,6 +170,12 @@ const struct mac_desc mac_table[ALG_MAX] = { >[ALG_SHA256] = HASH_DESC("Keyed SHA-256", sha256, SHA256), >[ALG_SHA384] = HASH_DESC("Keyed SHA-384", sha384, SHA384), >[ALG_SHA512] = HASH_DESC("Keyed SHA-512",

Re: Passive BGP configuration

2020-11-16 Thread Robert Scheck
Hello Ondrej, On Sun, 15 Nov 2020, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > Could you try add 'passive' to the working example to see whether the > issue is related to one-way establishment, or neighbor-range mode? yes, adding 'passive' to the working example keeps it still working. > Also, do you have any messa

PATCH: Added BGP attribute example to docs

2020-11-16 Thread Nigel Kukard
Hi guys, It took me some time to figure this out, perhaps a slight improvement to the docs attached may help. :) -N >From 0975f466e6cdf53223c1f6a2dab62d1ee80a2268 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nigel Kukard Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:16:26 + Subject: [PATCH] Doc: Added example of static rout

Re: Tests fail on s390x

2020-11-16 Thread Mark Stopka
I can confirm now that it is indeed the correct patch, thanks for producing it! -- Sent from mobile Best regards / S pozdravem, BSc. Mark Stopka, BBA Managing Partner @ PERLUR Group mobile: +420 704 373 561 website: www.perlur.cloud On Mon, Nov 16, 2020, 15:39 Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Mon, N

Re: Tests fail on s390x

2020-11-16 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 01:47:37PM +0100, Mark Stopka wrote: > Never mind, I think this commit fixes the problem... > > https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/2928c5bcc7c3caaeb6de34a84ca63de9a12e1f1a Yes, that is likely a fix for this issue. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago'

Re: Tests fail on s390x

2020-11-16 Thread Mark Stopka
Great, thanks for reaching out, I think I identified the patch that fixes it, I am currency building the patched version as I am not certain when new release will be cut! :-) New to the project and all, I am sure you know the drill! -- Best regards / S pozdravem, BSc. Mark Stopka, BBA Managing Part

Re: Tests fail on s390x

2020-11-16 Thread Robert Scheck
Hello Mark, On Mon, 16 Nov 2020, Mark Stopka wrote: > Has anybody looked into that? Fedora "solved it" by simply disabling tests > for s390x architecture, Debian and Ubuntu don't build Bird for s390x... ...Fedora here! According to my tests, BIRD 2.0.8 should have this fixed (it's already fixed i

Re: Tests fail on s390x

2020-11-16 Thread Mark Stopka
Never mind, I think this commit fixes the problem... https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/2928c5bcc7c3caaeb6de34a84ca63de9a12e1f1a Let me verify... -- Best regards / S pozdravem, BSc. Mark Stopka, BBA Managing Partner (at) PERLUR Group mobile: +420 704 373 561 website: www.perlur.cloud On

Tests fail on s390x

2020-11-16 Thread Mark Stopka
Hi, I am packaging bird 2.0.7 for openSUSE s390x, and the tests are failing with the following: [ 48s] LD -Wl,-z,relro -pie -pthread -o obj/nest/a-path_test obj/nest/a-path_test.o ... [ 48s] obj/filter/tree_test 0.115749752s [ OK ] [ 49s] obj/filter/filter_test 0.700194688s [ O