On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:25:44AM +, James Swineson wrote:
> Just use something like:
>
> protocol static {
> ipv4;
> route 192.168.1.0/24 unreachable;
> }
>
> You don't really need a valid next-hop if you are only importing static
> routes to eBGP since eBGP will overwrite next-hop
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:42:46PM +0200, Erik Zscheile wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get relatively much "log spam" about one specific BGP session which logs
> dozens of 'Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute' messages.
> I haven't found much information online, but have already tried to find out
> which code path i
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:17:07PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Static default route over unnumbered PPP interface is stuck in dormant state.
> Manually installing this route in kernel with 'ip route' does not give any
> issues.
Hmm, works for me (with latest master branch):
bird> show stati
> On 29. Apr 2020, at 03:01, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
>>> Well, the RFC 2545 is a bit vague and AFAIK nobody standardized
>>> link-local only sessions. Our position is that the first address is
>>> always global (as that is necessar
On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 14:44 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> What is an output of 'show interfaces' and static protocol config?
>
protocol static static1 {
ipv4 {import all;};
check link 1;
route 0.0.0.0/0 via 10.210.137.96 {preference=255;};
}
bird> show interfaces
lo up (index=1)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:17:07PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Static default route over unnumbered PPP interface is stuck in dormant state.
> Manually installing this route in kernel with 'ip route' does not give any
> issues.
Hi
What is an output of 'show interfaces' and static protocol c
Static default route over unnumbered PPP interface is stuck in dormant state.
Manually installing this route in kernel with 'ip route' does not give any
issues.
bird> show static
0.0.0.0/0
via 10.210.137.96 (dormant)
bird> show route
Table master4:
10.210.137.97/32 unicast [direct1
