Re: BGP repropagation practices on not well known attributes

2020-02-27 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:16:38PM +0100, Mattia Milani wrote: > Hello bird users, I'm sorry to bother you but I have a question about the > implementation of a piece of the RFC 4271 that I found a little bit fuzzy. > > I'm in a eBGP situation and suppose that I have more connections with other >

BGP repropagation practices on not well known attributes

2020-02-27 Thread Mattia Milani
Hello bird users, I'm sorry to bother you but I have a question about the implementation of a piece of the RFC 4271 that I found a little bit fuzzy. I'm in a eBGP situation and suppose that I have more connections with other different AS peers. Giving the fact that my import and export filters

Re: BGP w/ MD5 and range

2020-02-27 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:29:47PM +0100, Adam KuĊ‚agowski wrote: > Hi, > > I've found that It is supported since 4.14: > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/8917a777be3ba566377be05117f71b93a5fd909d Hi Fixed in latest commit [*], now TCP_MD5SIG should work with ranges. Did not try 0.0.0.0

Re: Unable to open included file even it has permissions?

2020-02-27 Thread Robert Scheck
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > You need group foo to access /var/lib/foo/, that is part of secondary > groups for bird user (as reported by 'id') and these secondary groups are > assigned e.g. when 'su - bird' is used. > > But when you run 'bird -u bird -g bird', it only set UID (-u)

Re: ROA with static protocol in BIRD 2

2020-02-27 Thread Robert Scheck
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote: > > Is the above under any circumstances valid in any BIRD 1.x version? I did > > not use BIRD 1.x much, but I thought it is strictly either IPv4 or IPv6... > > Correct, > > what you fx. can do is: Okay, while I'm using something similar for BIRD 2.

Re: ROA with static protocol in BIRD 2

2020-02-27 Thread Chriztoffer Hansen
Hi, Robert Scheck skrev: > Hello Maria, > > as of writing, OpenBSD rpki-client produces an output file for BIRD 1.x > like the following, where IPv4 and IPv6 end up in the same table. For me > this ends with "This is an IPv4 router, therefore IPv6 addresses are not > supported" error on BIRD 1.x