Re: Support for setting Aggregator IP/ASN in BGP Updates

2019-08-18 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:21:18PM +0200, Clemens Mosig wrote: > Hi all, > > we are manually announcing and withdrawing prefixes by disabling and > enabling a static protocol: > E.g: > > protocol static prefix{ >     ipv4; >     route 1.2.3.0/24 blackhole; > } > > Is there a way to manually set

Re: iBGP problem with full meshed routers

2019-08-18 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:11:20AM +0200, Martin Bosner wrote: > Hello Mike, > > thank you for your reply. I also thought about that but since other routers > (e.g. router E) can exchange routes with router A (routed over other BGPs) > i don't think that we need static routes or OSPF. Or is that a

Re: iBGP problem with full meshed routers

2019-08-18 Thread Martin Bosner
Hello Mike, thank you for your reply. I also thought about that but since other routers (e.g. router E) can exchange routes with router A (routed over other BGPs) i don't think that we need static routes or OSPF. Or is that assumption wrong? Thank you Am So., 18. Aug. 2019 um 19:01 Uhr schrieb M

Re: iBGP problem with full meshed routers

2019-08-18 Thread Michael McConnell
Hello Martin, I think you need a static route along the multihop path for this to work or use OSPF in parallel. Cheers, Mike -- Michael McConnell WINK Streaming; email: mich...@winkstreaming.com toll-free: 877-GO-4-WINK x 7400 direct: +1 732-705-7442 cell: +506 8706-2389 skype: wink-michael we

iBGP problem with full meshed routers

2019-08-18 Thread Martin Bosner
Hello, i'm a little desperate and helpless because i can't get any further with my current problem: My current setup (all same AS only physical): router A router B --- router C --- router E --- router G (has full \|| | table up