On 6/13/19 12:52 AM, Jakub Nowacki wrote:
Ok, now I have the whole picture. Having option to exchange routes
between multiple BIRD processes on same box (but in different
namespaces) would allow to simplify management of configuration.
I don't understand what Unix sockets provide that a vEth p
On 6/13/19 5:19 AM, Maria Matejka wrote:
Yes, BIRD processes in distinct netns's are separated (in context of
network)
Other namespaces can influence things too.
the suggested change is just to allow BGP session over Unix socket
instead of TCP (to allow for route exchange without configuring
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 17:26 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
> and know the content is safe.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:08:36AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote
Yes, BIRD processes in distinct netns's are separated (in context of
network) and the suggested change is just to allow BGP session over Unix
socket instead of TCP (to allow for route exchange without configuring a
link between netns's).
Maria
On 6/13/19 8:52 AM, Jakub Nowacki wrote:
Ok, now I
