On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Herold wrote:
> thx for the feedback that makes sensė. So this repo seems to me unusable
> anymore. RedHat/CentOS will not get ncurses6 after the next major
> release. Also there will be no current bird for RedHat/CentOS 6 and 7
> anymore.
You could also jus
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:27:30PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>>
>> >> And routes from other protocols with normal IPv6 channels should be
>> >> transformed to SADR routes with a ::/0 source?
>> >
>> > That is a tricky issue. I see fo
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 08:03:38PM +0200, Dean wrote:
> >>And routes from other protocols with normal IPv6 channels should be
> >>transformed to SADR routes with a ::/0 source?
> >That is a tricky issue. I see four possibilities:
> >
> >2) Soma hack to Pipe protocol that allows to bridge IP6 table
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:27:30PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>
> >> And routes from other protocols with normal IPv6 channels should be
> >> transformed to SADR routes with a ::/0 source?
> >
> > That is a tricky issue. I see four possibilities:
> >
> > 1) Some
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:07:14PM +, Reji Varghese wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> Want to quickly check this.
>
> Do we have VRF support today in the BIRD stack?
No. But in some cases you can use existing multiple routing tables
support.
> If not, is there a plan to add support for the same in t
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:46:58AM +0200, Stefan Plug wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> forgive me for my ignorance, but I just compiled 1.6.3-1 on a scientific
> linux 6.8 machine with ncurses 5.7 and installed that RPM on a centos7
> machine with ncurses 5.9 and it all seems to work just fine.
>
> What am
