Re: [PATCH,RFC 1/3] BGP: Implement secondary remote AS number support.

2017-03-11 Thread James Howlett
I don't know how I got on this email list. Please remove me. From: Bird-users on behalf of Lennert Buytenhek Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 8:39:37 AM To: Ondrej Zajicek Cc: bird-users@network.cz; David Barroso Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC 1/3] BGP: Implement secondar

Re: bgp proto bug with add paths in bird 1.6.3

2017-03-11 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > Thanks for the bugreport and patch. We already found and fixed the bug > during work on 2.0 branch [*], but we forgot to fix it in 1.6 branch. > Your patch should be OK. Merged -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Za

Re: [PATCH] Allow address scopes for non-link-local addresses

2017-03-11 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:50:34PM +, Fritz Grimpen wrote: > Hi. > > Here is a small patch which allows non-zero address scopes on > non-link-local addresses. This is required to create connections inside > a VRF domain, as the Linux kernel documentation states. Hi I would accept the patch,

Re: Hardware requirements for BIRD

2017-03-11 Thread Israel G. Lugo
Just to give an idea. I'm using multiple GNU/Linux routers with an Intel Atom C2758 (8-core SoC) and 8 GiB RAM to handle ~2k routes with Bird. Bird itself doesn't make a dent in CPU. These are building access routers; traffic is around 80 Mbit/s each (~ 6 kpps), with connection tracking and NAT. Us