Re: [PATCH] Gate boolean protocol options on filename.

2016-07-28 Thread Israel G. Lugo
On 07/28/2016 07:09 PM, João Taveira Araújo wrote: > Hi, > > Any feedback on this? > > I didn't follow up with a reply because the argument presented against > was a straw man fallacy followed by a slippery slope. I realize that I > could very well encode a boolean in 134 characters as in the ex

RE: [PATCH] Gate boolean protocol options on filename.

2016-07-28 Thread Pendzik, Edward
Hello All, Personally I like the proposed "existence-of-a-file-is-a-Boolean" approach because of the exact reason That it was originally proposed: It simplifies, clarifies, and significantly easies integrating bird config and control into other applications. Thanks! Edward Pendzik :-) -Or

Re: [PATCH] Gate boolean protocol options on filename.

2016-07-28 Thread João Taveira Araújo
Hi, Any feedback on this? I didn't follow up with a reply because the argument presented against was a straw man fallacy followed by a slippery slope. I realize that I could very well encode a boolean in 134 characters as in the example provided, but would rather signal that through the presence

Re: Getting details about LSAs

2016-07-28 Thread Israel G. Lugo
I take it this feature is not planned or feasible, then? -- Israel G. Lugo Núcleo de Redes e Comunicações Direção de Serviços de Informática Instituto Superior Técnico On 10-05-2016 18:55, Israel G. Lugo wrote: > Hello, > > > Is there a way to obtain more information about LSAs? I've been > deb