Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
>> Hmm, maybe this should be spelled out somewhere?
>
> Could you please clarify what exactly needs to be spelled out? I have
> the impression that the meaning of AE 0 is spelled out pretty clearly
> in all three pleaces where it is allowed. The one missing bit is
> Upd
>> It is not allowed in any other place -- in other places, RFC 6126 says
>> that AE MUST NOT be 0. (There's an omission in Section 4.4.9, where it
>> only says in what case AE MAY be 0; the implication is that it MUST
>> NOT be 0 in other cases.)
> Hmm, maybe this should be spelled out somewhere?
Vasiliy Tolstov writes:
> Do you have plans in near feature create ipv4 support?in this case I
> can drop bird and use only bird6 for ipv4/ipv6 routes inside my
> network.
Would love to, but that requires dual-stack support in Bird core. AFAIK
there are plans to support this eventually, but Ondr
Do you have plans in near feature create ipv4 support?in this case I can
drop bird and use only bird6 for ipv4/ipv6 routes inside my network.
1 Май 2016 г. 16:14 пользователь "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen"
написал:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>
> >> Right, yeah, the overflow check is done on the specifie
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:32:58PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>>
>> > - in some cases (e.g. babel_handle_route_request()), check for plen == 0
>> >or check if prefix is IPA_NONE is used where check for AE 0 should be
>> >used
Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
>> If this is not the case, I think the RFC needs to specify what,
>> exactly, is meant by a "wildcard address". I've always thought of
>> ::/0 as the wildcard address; and doesn't "default route" also mean
>> "wildcard route"?
>
> Wow, no.
Yes, feel free to marvel at
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:32:58PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>
> > - in some cases (e.g. babel_handle_route_request()), check for plen == 0
> >or check if prefix is IPA_NONE is used where check for AE 0 should be
> >used instead. Note that these are tw
> If this is not the case, I think the RFC needs to specify what, exactly,
> is meant by a "wildcard address". I've always thought of ::/0 as the
> wildcard address; and doesn't "default route" also mean "wildcard
> route"?
Wow, no.
The main purpose of a routing protocol is to carry prefixes. No
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> Some comments to my changes. I originally thought that i would just do
> some minor formatting changes, but i end with some heavy code changes and
> plenty of bugfixes. Hopefully i did not make much more errors.
Thanks for the overview. Some comments below.
> Some issue
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>> Right, yeah, the overflow check is done on the specified values not
>> their centisecond equivalents. Oops.
>
> IMHO the reasonable way would be to keep such values (intervals)
> internally in Babel native time units (centiseconds) and only convert
> to BIRD units when a
10 matches
Mail list logo