On 12/5/2015 9:54 AM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Brian Rak wrote:
Sorry for late answer, 'device route' i call a route for directly
attached network prefix, with associated iface but without associated
gateway IP. Perhaps there is a better / more established
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 04:40:06PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:50:54AM +0300, Anton Kiryushkin wrote:
> > But in birdc I didn't see any metrics. I have two server with same config
> > and same addresses on interfaces lo and dummy0 with different priorities.
> > Could y
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:50:54AM +0300, Anton Kiryushkin wrote:
> But in birdc I didn't see any metrics. I have two server with same config
> and same addresses on interfaces lo and dummy0 with different priorities.
> Could you help me with export filter?
Hi
First, to export some route as an ex
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:12:10PM +, Rohrmann Sascha wrote:
> > Well, you could use static default-route and 'check link' option, but that
> > will help you only in the third case, not in the second one.
> > For the second case, you must have some other way to establish whether ISP
> > is u
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:23:04PM -0800, João Taveira Araújo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into a difference in behaviour between bird and bird6,
> although admittedly it may come from netlink itself. I'm using bird
> 1.5.0, but have also tried with build from latest git head.
>
> Assume a connec
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:53:55AM +0100, Bartosz Radwan wrote:
> I have similiar config on my Linux router, but in my case source address
> exists until i shut the interface down.
> When the interface is shut down (ifdown interfacename), bird crashes.
>
> May be dangerous, i could imaginge situat
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Brian Rak wrote:
> >Sorry for late answer, 'device route' i call a route for directly
> >attached network prefix, with associated iface but without associated
> >gateway IP. Perhaps there is a better / more established term for such
> >routes.
> >
> Sorry,
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:15:16PM +0100, D.Wesołowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
...
>
> the last two line don't works.
> I'm looking for some hint to make it work as I want ;)
You mean this ones?
> return (bgp_path.first ~ [ 51931, 51944 ]);
> #if bgp_path.first ~ [ 51931, 51944 ] then return true;
