[Bioc-devel] GenomicRanges::cbind() problem

2017-09-12 Thread Robert Castelo
dear GenomicRanges developers, my package qpgraph is breaking in devel due to the following behavior of GenomicRanges: library(GenomicRanges) gr <- GRanges(seqnames=rep("1", 10), IRanges(1:10, width=1)) mcols(gr) DataFrame with 10 rows and 0 columns mcols(gr) <- cbind(mcols(gr), DataFrame(test

Re: [Bioc-devel] Package DMCHMM is not installed

2017-09-12 Thread Farhad Shokoohi
Thanks but that didn’t clarify why users should install the dev version. Why the package is not on the page http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/BiocViews.html#___Software Sorry this is first time I submitted a package to bioconductor and I am not so familiar with instructions. > On Sep 11

Re: [Bioc-devel] GenomicRanges::cbind() problem

2017-09-12 Thread Michael Lawrence
I think this was fixed in S4Vectors a couple of days ago but I forgot to bump the version (just did). Sorry. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Robert Castelo wrote: > dear GenomicRanges developers, > > my package qpgraph is breaking in devel due to the following behavior of > GenomicRanges: > > l

Re: [Bioc-devel] Package DMCHMM is not installed

2017-09-12 Thread Shepherd, Lori
Bioconductor has a release version and a devel version. Releases happen twice a year (The next occurring at the end of October). All new packages accepted will remain in the devel version of Bioconductor until the next schedule release. The package for that time, will only be available on the

Re: [Bioc-devel] Package DMCHMM is not installed

2017-09-12 Thread Leonardo Collado Torres
From http://bioconductor.org/developers/package-submission/ Following acceptance of a package: Packages accepted on the tracker repository are added to the ‘devel’ branch of the Bioconductor SVN repository, with the current version number of the accepted package. Packages are then built by the Bi

Re: [Bioc-devel] Package DMCHMM is not installed

2017-09-12 Thread Farhad Shokoohi
Thanks. Everything is clear to me now. > On Sep 12, 2017, at 9:08 AM, Shepherd, Lori > wrote: > > Bioconductor has a release version and a devel version. Releases happen > twice a year (The next occurring at the end of October). All new packages > accepted will remain in the devel version

Re: [Bioc-devel] failing Bioconductor package DeepBlueR

2017-09-12 Thread Markus List
Dear all, Our DeepBlueR package is currently not passing R CMD check in devel because of a class cache issue: http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/DeepBlueR/tokay1-checksrc.html Found more than one class "file" in cache; using the first, from namespace 'BiocGenerics' Also defin

Re: [Bioc-devel] GenomicRanges::cbind() problem

2017-09-12 Thread Robert Castelo
yep, i've cloned, built and installed the latest S4Vectors and then qpgraph builds and checks cleanly. thanks robert. On 09/12/2017 03:06 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: I think this was fixed in S4Vectors a couple of days ago but I forgot to bump the version (just did). Sorry. On Tue, Sep 12

[Bioc-devel] Fwd: Hook declined on a branch

2017-09-12 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
Begin forwarded message: From: ni41435_ca mailto:nitesh.tur...@roswellpark.org>> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Hook declined on a branch Date: September 12, 2017 at 7:33:00 AM EDT To: Samuel Wieczorek mailto:samuel.wieczo...@cea.fr>> You cannot create branches on upstream. The only ones allowed

Re: [Bioc-devel] updating Bioconductor package that is already on Github

2017-09-12 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
Hi Simina, Please try again now. The issue was you didn’t submit your SVN ID “s.boca”. This is needed for people who have been maintainers before the Git transition, to associate your key to the package. For new packages this issue doesn’t apply, because we just collect their Github IDs. Ho

Re: [Bioc-devel] clarifying initialization for BiocCheck

2017-09-12 Thread Ludwig Geistlinger
Let's consider loading the `bods` object via `data` from the pathview package. I guess you can either use > bods <- get(data("bods", package="pathview")) or > bods <- NULL > data("bods", package="pathview") to make this note go away. > "Consider clarifying how 6 object(s) are initialized" >

Re: [Bioc-devel] clarifying initialization for BiocCheck

2017-09-12 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi, I would just ignore that note. H. On 09/12/2017 07:19 AM, Ludwig Geistlinger wrote: Let's consider loading the `bods` object via `data` from the pathview package. I guess you can either use bods <- get(data("bods", package="pathview")) or bods <- NULL data("bods", package="pathview"

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

2017-09-12 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
Your key is in our system. It starts with, ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACAQD4+kbkP7J0rkIGy81r9fO+4tCgHzQXfkthRu/MFPE7AMvZy7SeNf9WuxPQtMeOjAl It is associated with the correct package “pathview” and also “gageData”. Please give me more information to help you. Show me the exact commands y

Re: [Bioc-devel] failing Bioconductor package DeepBlueR

2017-09-12 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Markus, The class cache issue is just a warning here and is distracting. What seems to break deepblue_liftover() is a recent change to rtracklayer::import.chain. Looks like commit a3c4308d928290700c6326eabda8dea4a96146e3 from Sep 4 might be the culprit. Cheers, H. On 09/12/2017 06:29 AM, Ma

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

2017-09-12 Thread Luo Weijun via Bioc-devel
the following the are commands I used and output: luo$ git clone g...@git.bioconductor.org:packages/pathview Cloning into 'pathview'... key_load_public: invalid format Permission denied (publickey). fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights

Re: [Bioc-devel] ExperimentList Contructor Failing

2017-09-12 Thread Marcel Ramos
Hi Dario, I wasn't able to reproduce this error on my version of Ubuntu. (see below) Please kindly post any future package inquiries at support.bioconductor.org. Best, Marcel --- > ExperimentList() ExperimentList class object of length 0: > BiocInstaller::biocValid() * sessionInfo() R v

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

2017-09-12 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
What name did you store your key under? “id_rsa” or something else? Nitesh > On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Luo Weijun wrote: > > the following the are commands I used and output: > > luo$ git clone g...@git.bioconductor.org:packages/pathview > Cloning into 'pathview'... > key_load_public: inva

Re: [Bioc-devel] Identical methods in two packages

2017-09-12 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Laurent, The 2 Ontology,character methods defined in AnnotationDbi and rols do very different things. The 1st one expects a vector of GO IDs and returns the GO sub-ontologies that they belong to: > Ontology(c("GO:009", "GO:012", "GO:006")) GO:009 GO:012 GO:006 "M

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

2017-09-12 Thread Luo Weijun via Bioc-devel
The original file name was id_rsa.pub.pub. I changed it to id_rsa.pub or id_rsa now. It stops complaining about the invalid format, but still have permission problem. ##id_rsa.pub luo$ git clone g...@git.bioconductor.org:packages/pathview Cloning into 'pathview'... Permission denied (publickey).

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

2017-09-12 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/faq/ You need point#16 on the FAQ section. Change your permissions. > On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Luo Weijun wrote: > > The original file name was id_rsa.pub.pub. > I changed it to id_rsa.pub or id_rsa now. It stops complaining about the > inv

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

2017-09-12 Thread Luo Weijun via Bioc-devel
Well, I modified the file acces by: chmod 400 ~/.ssh/id_rsa it goes further, but the passphrase I stored seems not work (as below). I couldn’t change passphrase either due to the same problem. Can I remove the old ssh key, regenerated/resubmit a new key? What’s the best way to proceed? luo$ git

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

2017-09-12 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
Please regenerate a new key and submit. > On Sep 12, 2017, at 1:26 PM, Luo Weijun wrote: > > Well, I modified the file acces by: > chmod 400 ~/.ssh/id_rsa > > it goes further, but the passphrase I stored seems not work (as below). I > couldn’t change passphrase either due to the same problem.

Re: [Bioc-devel] Identical methods in two packages

2017-09-12 Thread Laurent Gatto
Hi Herve, I understand that there is a clash between the two identical methods. Both packages seem to have good reasons to implement their own `Ontology,character`. Such clashes are relatively frequent. My issue really is that when unloading AnnotationDbi's namespace, `Ontology,character` is rem

Re: [Bioc-devel] Identical methods in two packages

2017-09-12 Thread Michael Lawrence
I think I'm going to vote for the policy that methods with identical signatures are currently unsupported by the methods package. It's tough to imagine how they might work in any reliable and natural way, and they totally break the methods package currently. In the grand scheme of things, generics

Re: [Bioc-devel] Identical methods in two packages

2017-09-12 Thread Vincent Carey
For this particular problem, it may be worth noting that http://geneontology.org/page/ontology-structure describes CC, MF, BP as "sub-ontologies" of GO. AnnotationDbi might replace its Ontology() with subontology() to acquire those tokens. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Michael Lawrence wrot

[Bioc-devel] BiocStyle2: issue with wide figure command

2017-09-12 Thread Ludwig Geistlinger
Dear Andrzej, BiocStyle2 is a great piece of work and the new vignettes look really nice! Thank you! However, I am having a problem with the widefigure (figure*) environment, which apparently only holds for my local installation, as the same vignette builds fine here: http://bioconductor.org/che

Re: [Bioc-devel] BiocStyle2: issue with wide figure command

2017-09-12 Thread Andrzej Oleś
Hi Ludwig, thank you! This sounds like an issue with your LaTeX distribution, in particular the package 'marginfix'. Please make sure that all the packages listed in the BiocStyle vignette under Appendix B "Attached LATEX packages" are installed, and possibly the up-to-date. Best, Andrzej On Tue

Re: [Bioc-devel] Identical methods in two packages

2017-09-12 Thread Hervé Pagès
On 09/12/2017 01:58 PM, Vincent Carey wrote: For this particular problem, it may be worth noting that https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__geneontology.org_page_ontology-2Dstructure&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=ECJZN8XlNzgWTqEBb

Re: [Bioc-devel] ExperimentList Contructor Failing

2017-09-12 Thread Dario Strbenac
Good day, Whatever the problem is, it's gone with R Under Development and all packages installed from the development branch of Bioconductor. -- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia ___ B

[Bioc-devel] MultiAssayExperiment Subsetting Fails if Column Data Has One Column

2017-09-12 Thread Dario Strbenac
Good day, Subsetting a MultiAssayExperiment object fails if the column data has one column but not 2 or more columns. Perhaps drop = FALSE is missing for the DataFrame subsetting. A minimal example is: rowColNames <- list(paste0("Gene", 1:10), paste0("Person", 1:10)) aTable <- matrix(rnorm(100)

[Bioc-devel] Creating an org.Hs.uniprot.db package

2017-09-12 Thread Aditya Bhagwat
Hey guys, I love the org.Hs.eg.db package (and similar others for other organisms). I work a lot with LCMSMS proteomics data, and I have always missed a similar org.Hs.uniprot.db package, so I am thinking of creating that (and then sharing it on BioC, to benefit fellow proteomics R users). Wou

Re: [Bioc-devel] Creating an org.Hs.uniprot.db package

2017-09-12 Thread Rainer Johannes
Hi Aditya, you could check the more recent ensembldb EnsDb databases to see if there is something in them you might need/want. I've added protein annotations to them (as provided by Ensembl). They contain the Ensembl protein domains, the AA sequence, all protein domain families (as defined/linked

Re: [Bioc-devel] Creating an org.Hs.uniprot.db package

2017-09-12 Thread Aditya Bhagwat
Hi Johannes, Thanks for your feedback! I tried ensembl based maps earlier, but I loose many features. In LCMS proteomics the unit of identification and quantification is a uniprot accession, so annotation mappings would benefit from a uniprot-centric database object. Cheers, Aditya __