Re: [Bioc-devel] R6 and Bioconductor

2017-05-14 Thread Garth Ilsley
Thanks for the pointers and advice. I'll have a look at these. > As far as separating implementation from interface, a fairly simple separation > is fields are implementation, methods are interface. While active bindings > allow encapsulated fields (often called "properties" > in other languages),

Re: [Bioc-devel] R6 and Bioconductor

2017-05-14 Thread Garth Ilsley
Thanks for explaining the context. It helps to understand what Bioconductor developers expect. > On 05/12/2017 07:11 AM, Martin Morgan wrote: > > On 05/12/2017 02:05 AM, Garth Ilsley wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am thinking of creating package for Bioconductor, and I am > >> wondering about the