Re: [Bioc-devel] inquiry about possibility of package name change

2016-07-04 Thread Dario Strbenac
Hello, If your software was released first, why would you want to change its name ? It would make more sense to write to the creators of the newer software and ask them why they didn't check if someone else already used that software name before releasing their software with an identical name t

Re: [Bioc-devel] Experiment data packages

2016-07-04 Thread Martin Morgan
On 07/04/2016 02:40 AM, Aaron Taudt wrote: Dear all, I am trying to update my experiment data package. I read the instructions at http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/source-control#experiment-data-packages but it's not clear to me at all how to do it the right way. The package infrastructu

[Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

2016-07-04 Thread Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Dear All, During at least the last eight days I think there have been no new builds, nor build reports, for BioC 3.4 (devel): http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/ Is this on purpose? Best, R. -- Ramon Diaz-Uriarte Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25 Facultad de Medici

Re: [Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

2016-07-04 Thread Andrzej Oleś
Hi Ramon, why do you think there have been no build in the past week? The header on the page you provided says: *This page was generated on 2016-07-03 15:29:33 -0700 (Sun, 03 Jul 2016).* >From what I see the builds are up to date and reflect recent changes to the svn. Maybe some browser caching

Re: [Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

2016-07-04 Thread Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Hi Andrezj, Sorry, the text of the message was not explicit (but the subject message was): no builds for **Windows**. So, yes, the page says "This page was generated on 2016-07-03 15:29:33 -0700 (Sun, 03 Jul 2016)." but there are not reports for Windows, only for machines zin1 (Linux) and Moreli

Re: [Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

2016-07-04 Thread Andrzej Oleś
I'm sorry, I didn't notice the Windows part in the message subject. Indeed, the windows builder in devel seems to be offline. For example, the the latest version of BiocStyle available from the website is 2.1.4, while the subsequent version 2.1.5 was committed almost a month ago on Jun 9. I'm not

Re: [Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

2016-07-04 Thread Martin Morgan
On 07/04/2016 09:13 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote: I'm sorry, I didn't notice the Windows part in the message subject. Indeed, the windows builder in devel seems to be offline. For example, the the latest version of BiocStyle available from the website is 2.1.4, while the subsequent version 2.1.5 was c

Re: [Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

2016-07-04 Thread Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Thanks for looking into this Martin. Best, R. On Mon, 04-07-2016, at 15:20, Martin Morgan wrote: > On 07/04/2016 09:13 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote: >> I'm sorry, I didn't notice the Windows part in the message subject. >> >> Indeed, the windows builder in devel seems to be offline. For example, th

Re: [Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

2016-07-04 Thread Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Dear Andrzej, On Mon, 04-07-2016, at 15:13, Andrzej Oleś wrote: > I'm sorry, I didn't notice the Windows part in the message subject. I should have been explicit in the message body. My fault. > > Indeed, the windows builder in devel seems to be offline. For example, the > the latest version o

Re: [Bioc-devel] inquiry about possibility of package name change

2016-07-04 Thread Zhu, Lihua (Julie)
Thanks, Dario! That would be one way to deal with this if I had seen the other software before its Nature Biotechnology publication. FYI, we will stick to our original name if reviewers are ok with it. Best, Julie > On Jul 4, 2016, at 4:01 AM, Dario Strbenac wrote: > > Hello, > > If your