Re: [Bioc-devel] split on IRanges semantic change 3.3->3.4

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Lawrence
Hi Marcin, I'm not sure I agree with that Stack Overflow answer. Sure, ceiling(1:100/10) is a neat arithmetical trick to get what you want, but it would be a lot more obvious to me at least to use rep(1:10, each=10). And even better to use Partitioning objects when you have IRanges around. If you

Re: [Bioc-devel] split on IRanges semantic change 3.3->3.4

2016-12-05 Thread Michael Lawrence
Sorry about that. I pushed a fix to devel (2.9.14) and soon release. Btw, it's not typically a good idea to use a real valued vector as a factor. In this case, you could use %/% or better yet a partitioning, i.e., relist(ir, PartitioningByEnd(seq(10, 100, 10))). Michael On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8: