Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-27 Thread Gordon Brown
From: Martin Morgan mailto:mtmor...@fredhutch.org>> Date: Tuesday, 27 January 2015 12:04 To: Gord Brown mailto:gordon.br...@cruk.cam.ac.uk>>, "bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>" mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>> Subject: Re: [Bioc-dev

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-27 Thread Martin Morgan
hint as to what I should be doing differently? Thanks in advance, - Gord Brown Details: R v3.1.2, and also the latest devel version gnu make 3.81, 3.82, 4.1 centos linux 6.6 * * Message: 3 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:36:46 -0800 From: Martin Morgan mailto:mtmor...@fredhutch.org>

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-27 Thread Gordon Brown
Can you give me a hint as to what I should be doing differently? Thanks in advance, - Gord Brown Details: R v3.1.2, and also the latest devel version gnu make 3.81, 3.82, 4.1 centos linux 6.6 Message: 3 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:36:46 -0800 From: Martin Morgan mailto:mtmor...@fredhutch.org&

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-24 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
gt; >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Kevin Ushey >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Dan Tenenbaum >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Original Message - >>>> >>>>

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-23 Thread Martin Morgan
ri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kevin Ushey" To: "Laurent Gatto" Cc: "bioc-devel" Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:58:40 PM Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax If I understand correctly, all vers

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-23 Thread Michael Lawrence
2015 at 5:18 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: >> >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Kevin Ushey" >>> To: "Laurent Gatto" >>> Cc: "bioc-devel" >>> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:58:40 PM >>> Subjec

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-23 Thread Kevin Ushey
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Kevin Ushey" >> To: "Laurent Gatto" >> Cc: "bioc-devel" >> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:58:40 PM >> Subject: Re: [

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-23 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Ushey" > To: "Laurent Gatto" > Cc: "bioc-devel" > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:58:40 PM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax > > If I understand correctly, all versions of

Re: [Bioc-devel] portable make syntax

2015-01-23 Thread Kevin Ushey
If I understand correctly, all versions of `make` on the BioC build systems will support GNU extensions to Makefiles, and so it's probably not worth your time to make this 'portable' -- just add the SystemRequirements bit. However, you could work around this by (following R-exts at http://cran.r-p