Hi
however unlike an iphone Bioconductor is only (as far as I know)
supported for the current release. We all do our best to help users
when they find problems and in most cases when I have suggested they
upgrade they have done so- solving their problems. If they were more
aware of being using an
Hi,
there is benefit in having newest versions, but I think we shouldn't get
carried away, and find Martin's suggestion reasonable. I don't want to be told
to go get an iPhone 5 every time I update an app on my iPhone 4 - even if that
same app would work much better there. People may have legiti
Martin, Herve, Simon, et al,
i see a straightforward approach without the need to change biocLite()
or BiocInstaller behavior. what about every package deciding in loading
time to tell or not the user whether he/she should be using the latest
version of the package, if he/she is not using it?
Hi
I second improving the awareness of users about new Bioc releases and
also personally do not mind loud messages while I am
installing/upgrading packages, even if it is each time I source/run
biocLite(). Indeed for old releases that I maintain for old projects
very rarely have to install a new p
Hi Martin
good to see that Herve agrees with me, and I reiterate my point, because
I consider this issue very important.
The average user does _not_ expect that a function like 'biocLite',
which has the express purpose of downloading and installing packages,
does not pull the newest package.
On 06/19/2013 11:17 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Martin,
Just to make sure we are on the same page, we are talking about
the message we get when we source http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R
(as Simon suggested), not the message we get when loading the
BiocInstaller package and/or everytime we use bioc
Martin,
Just to make sure we are on the same page, we are talking about
the message we get when we source http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R
(as Simon suggested), not the message we get when loading the
BiocInstaller package and/or everytime we use biocLite().
So it's a one time thing. IMO it ca
On 06/19/2013 09:15 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 06/19/2013 05:21 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
On 06/19/2013 03:01 PM, Simon Anders wrote:
Hi
On 19/06/13 23:44, Martin Morgan wrote:
As a message (not warning or error), how about
New features are available in Bioconductor version 2.12
Hi Martin,
On 06/19/2013 05:21 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
On 06/19/2013 03:01 PM, Simon Anders wrote:
Hi
On 19/06/13 23:44, Martin Morgan wrote:
As a message (not warning or error), how about
New features are available in Bioconductor version 2.12, R version
3.0.1.
See http://bioconducto
On 06/19/2013 03:01 PM, Simon Anders wrote:
Hi
On 19/06/13 23:44, Martin Morgan wrote:
As a message (not warning or error), how about
New features are available in Bioconductor version 2.12, R version
3.0.1.
See http://bioconductor.org/install
and if the instructions / dire consequences
Hi,
I support this too.
On 06/19/2013 02:44 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
On 06/19/2013 02:24 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote:
I support this.
A notice that there is a newer version available is something a number
of users
would almost expect (since a number of the applications they use probably
already
Hi
On 19/06/13 23:44, Martin Morgan wrote:
As a message (not warning or error), how about
New features are available in Bioconductor version 2.12, R version
3.0.1.
See http://bioconductor.org/install
and if the instructions / dire consequences at
http://bioconductor.org/install are not s
On 06/19/2013 02:24 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote:
I support this.
A notice that there is a newer version available is something a number of users
would almost expect (since a number of the applications they use probably
already do so), and would be in aligned with the bioconductor effort to reach
t
I support this.
A notice that there is a newer version available is something a number
of users would almost expect (since a number of the applications they
use probably already do so), and would be in aligned with the
bioconductor effort to reach the widest possible audience.
However, users
14 matches
Mail list logo
