Thanks Martin. I've already been working on the new version as a separate
package, although branched from the previous code base because I was
planning on merging it back in.
After some thought, I do think the best way to do it will be to deprecate
the original package, including the name of the n
On 05/28/2015 06:32 AM, Robert M. Flight wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Wolfgang. I never thought to look at how many
packages in Bioconductor have a baseName and baseName2 to see how often
this is done. I assume based on the existence of Roxygen2 and ggplot2 that
there were initial versions of t
Thanks for the feedback Wolfgang. I never thought to look at how many
packages in Bioconductor have a baseName and baseName2 to see how often
this is done. I assume based on the existence of Roxygen2 and ggplot2 that
there were initial versions of those named Roxygen and ggplot.
This also seems li
Robert
with the packages cellHTS, cellHTS2 and DESeq, DESeq2 (and with the functions
vsn, vsn2 in the vsn package) I three times chose route 1, and am generally
happy about it. In due time, you can deprecate and then defunct the old one.
Option 2 seems needlessly disruptive (potentially). A lar
