On 06/18/2015 05:53 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
Let the record show that it was relatively trivial to add a generic
function called update() to fix the broken serialized instances of the
older SE-descendant classes that now inherit from RSE...
Although it was a drag until I got around to writing
Let the record show that it was relatively trivial to add a generic
function called update() to fix the broken serialized instances of the
older SE-descendant classes that now inherit from RSE...
Although it was a drag until I got around to writing those.
I'll try to put together a decently sized
Elena,
On 06/18/2015 10:48 AM, Elena Grassi wrote:
Hi Hervé,
thanks for your kind answer - refactoring is always good, I've lagged
behind in the last months not following the novelties so to be
truthful it has been my fault and today I was in a bit of a hurry for
other reasons.
I'm in the pro
I'm sorry I was not expecting other developers to fix my package for every
mods to base packages that's why I asked...I'm still new to this world and
I decided to ask before fixing too soon or making further structural errors
- I usually like the gory details but unfortunately lack time to follow
t
Hi Tim,
On 06/18/2015 10:48 AM, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
Hey since the refactoring is already breaking stuff willy nilly, can I make a
few suggestions?
1) please for the love of all that is holy have backwards compatible methods
for RSEs. It's excruciating to have RSE as the target class, supp
I agree 100%: It would be wonderful to have a roadmap and (perhaps) some
high level discussion of what should be done for various things. Things
are breaking right and left and we don't want to have to deal with this
again in 6 months, so why don't we make sure the design has been looked at
with m
Hi Hervé,
thanks for your kind answer - refactoring is always good, I've lagged
behind in the last months not following the novelties so to be
truthful it has been my fault and today I was in a bit of a hurry for
other reasons.
> I'm in the process of re-serializing
> RangedSummarizedExperiment o
Hey since the refactoring is already breaking stuff willy nilly, can I make a
few suggestions?
1) please for the love of all that is holy have backwards compatible methods
for RSEs. It's excruciating to have RSE as the target class, supporting
RELEASE users with SE, and have to do endless duck
Hi Elena,
Sorry for the inconvenience caused by the refactoring of
SummarizedExperiment objects.
On 06/18/2015 03:41 AM, Elena Grassi wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing as long as I am struggling a bit to keep the pace of
RangedSummarizedExperiment in my package roar, whose main class
contains RangedSu
