> I believe in the past we tried suggesting removing a R dependency
>> > altogether but that R CMD check complained not having an R dependency?
>> > Maybe someone remembers more about this.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Lori Shepherd
>
;
> >
> > Lori Shepherd
> >
> > Bioconductor Core Team
> >
> > Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
> >
> > Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
> >
> > Elm & Carlton Streets
> >
> > Buffalo, New York 14263
> >
> >
ive Cancer Center
>
> Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
>
> Elm & Carlton Streets
>
> Buffalo, New York 14263
>
> ________________
> From: Kasper Daniel Hansen
> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 1:33 PM
> To: Kern, Lori
> Cc: bioc-devel
> S
ics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Kasper Daniel Hansen
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 1:33 PM
To: Kern, Lori
Cc: bioc-devel
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] BiocCheck and version requirement
But why is it even a warning? The submission polic
But why is it even a warning? The submission policy is that warnings are
discouraged. This means that developers will adapt to this warning.
The check is also against the policies on the website which state you don't
need a formal dependency.
Best,
Kasper
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:53 PM Kern, Lor
This requirement has been around for awhile. New package submissions are
checked against the devel version of Bioconductor. At the moment this is R
devel (R 4.1) and Bioconductor packages in devel for 3.13. Given that
Bioconductor releases are closely tied to a R release, and changes in R can
