Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created

2015-04-17 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Rue-Albrecht" > To: "Tiphaine Martin" > Cc: "Dan Tenenbaum" , "bioc-devel" > > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 4:30:24 AM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created > > > &

Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created

2015-04-17 Thread Martin, Tiphaine
mailto:dtene...@fredhutch.org>>, bioc-devel mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created Hi Tiphaine, I have followed both of your links,. and they both work for me. Probably just a glitch in the connection ? Hi Dan, I have a quick question of my own, I

Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created

2015-04-17 Thread Kevin Rue-Albrecht
> From: "Henrik Bengtsson" > >> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" > >> Cc: "bioc-devel" > >> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 6:57:45 PM > >> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at

Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created

2015-04-17 Thread Martin, Tiphaine
:44, "Dan Tenenbaum" wrote: > > >- Original Message - >> From: "Henrik Bengtsson" >> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" >> Cc: "bioc-devel" >> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 6:57:45 PM >> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1

Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created

2015-04-16 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Apr 16, 2015 9:44 PM, "Dan Tenenbaum" wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Henrik Bengtsson" > > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" > > Cc: "bioc-devel" > > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 6:57:45 PM > > S

Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created

2015-04-16 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Henrik Bengtsson" > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" > Cc: "bioc-devel" > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 6:57:45 PM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Dan Tenen

Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 3.1 branch created

2015-04-16 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > The BioC 3.1 branch is now ready. > > Remember, you always have access to 2 versions of your package: > the "release" and the "devel" versions. > > Right now the "release" version of your package (which is not > officially released yet but wi