On 11/06/2013 11:29 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
Great, thanks for updating. I legitimately wanted to use %in%, not %over%.
Great to hear you have a use case for %in% (with the new behavior). So
I'm not the only one ;-)
H.
Michael
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Hervé Pagès mailto:hpa...@
Great, thanks for updating. I legitimately wanted to use %in%, not %over%.
Michael
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>
> On 11/05/2013 04:30 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
>
>> I'm getting a little tired of this one popping up:
>>
>> In x %in% other :
>> Star
Hi Michael,
On 11/05/2013 04:30 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
I'm getting a little tired of this one popping up:
In x %in% other :
Starting with BioC 2.12, the behavior of %in% on GenomicRanges objects
has changed to use *equality* instead of *overlap* for comparing
elements between Gen
I'm getting a little tired of this one popping up:
In x %in% other :
Starting with BioC 2.12, the behavior of %in% on GenomicRanges objects
has changed to use *equality* instead of *overlap* for comparing
elements between GenomicRanges objects 'x' and 'table'. Now 'x[i]' and
'table[j]' ar
