Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-12 Thread Dario Strbenac
Good day, Thanks. I'll use the [limma] specifier to avoid the Warning from the build system. -- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat

Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-12 Thread Martin Morgan
Thank you, the reproducible example helps one think through things. For what it's worth the warning can be generated via > tools:::.check_Rd_xrefs(dir = "~/Downloads/Tester") Looking at the code and reflecting on the issue, since limma is in the Suggests: field, it is not guaranteed to be in

Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-11 Thread Dario Strbenac
Good day, I created a minimalist package that demonstrates the issue and it is attached to this letter. After using R CMD build, the subsequent R CMD check process emits one warning. -- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia Tester

Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-11 Thread Martin Morgan
On 05/11/2018 06:00 PM, Dario Strbenac wrote: Good day, limma was installed using biocLite, so it would be built before R CMD check was run. I could summarise all of the relevant information and send to R-package-devel mailing list to check if it is a bug. the 'relevant information' needs

Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-11 Thread Dario Strbenac
Good day, limma was installed using biocLite, so it would be built before R CMD check was run. I could summarise all of the relevant information and send to R-package-devel mailing list to check if it is a bug. -- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdow

Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-11 Thread Martin Morgan
I'm not really sure about this, but Writing R Extensions says about these forms of \link that they are seldom needed, except when linking to "not-yet-installed packages". I think if you were to have installed limma without first building it (e.g., R CMD INSTALL limma rather than R CMD INSTALL l

Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-11 Thread Dario Strbenac
Good day, Indeed, it is in the Suggests component of the dependency specification. I didn't find any extra requirements for this case in the Cross-references section of Writing R Extensions, so I'm unsure of where to read about the rule. -- Dario Strbenac Uni

Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-11 Thread Martin Morgan
On 05/11/2018 01:00 AM, Dario Strbenac wrote: Good day, I have documented a parameter that is linked to lmFit's documentation. \item{...}{Optional settings that are passed to \code{\link{lmFit}}.} The package checking process displays a warning. * checking Rd cross-references ... WARNING Mi

[Bioc-devel] Unexpected Warning About Cross-Reference Without Package Specification

2018-05-10 Thread Dario Strbenac
Good day, I have documented a parameter that is linked to lmFit's documentation. \item{...}{Optional settings that are passed to \code{\link{lmFit}}.} The package checking process displays a warning. * checking Rd cross-references ... WARNING Missing link or links in documentation object 'limma