Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-08-06 Thread Dario Strbenac
Pagès Cc: Dario Strbenac; bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs On 07/31/2013 04:05 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > Hi Dario, > > Thanks for providing the file. > > The file has 55780092 records in it and yes it only contains primary

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-08-02 Thread Michael Lawrence
me of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs() (11 min / 15 >> min >> with BioC devel on my Linux server). This is a little bit >> surprising >> to me and that's something I'd like to investigate. >> >> Cheers, >> H. >> >

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-08-02 Thread Martin Morgan
<https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/2013-June/053390.html> Cheers, H. ----- Original Message - From: "Dario Strbenac" mailto:dstr7...@uni.sydney.edu.au>> To: bioc-devel@r-projec

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-08-02 Thread Michael Lawrence
ppedAlignments() takes more than 70% >> of the total time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs() (11 min / 15 min >> with BioC devel on my Linux server). This is a little bit surprising >> to me and that's something I'd like to investigate. >> >> Cheers, >> H. >

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-08-02 Thread Martin Morgan
gate the granges coercion function ? It also took half an hour. ________ From: Hervé Pagès [hpa...@fhcrc.org] Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013 3:29 AM To: Dario Strbenac Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs On 07/29/

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-07-31 Thread Hervé Pagès
n function ? It also took half an hour. ____ From: Hervé Pagès [hpa...@fhcrc.org] Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013 3:29 AM To: Dario Strbenac Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs On 07/29/2013 12:00 AM, Dari

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-07-29 Thread Hervé Pagès
user system elapsed 1681.36 65.79 1752.10 From: Pages, Herve [hpa...@fhcrc.org] Sent: Monday, 29 July 2013 3:29 PM To: Dario Strbenac Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs Hi Dario, The functio

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-07-29 Thread Dario Strbenac
:29 PM To: Dario Strbenac Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs Hi Dario, The function was optimized in Bioc-devel. Depending on the number of records in your BAM file (which is more relevant than its size), it should now be between 2x and

Re: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-07-28 Thread Pages, Herve
30 PM Subject: [Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs Hello, Could readBamGappedAlignmentPairs be optimised ? It's surprising that it takes an extra 29 minutes to calculate the pairing information, for the example below. The BAM file is 4 GB in size

[Bioc-devel] Running Time of readBamGappedAlignmentPairs

2013-07-28 Thread Dario Strbenac
Hello, Could readBamGappedAlignmentPairs be optimised ? It's surprising that it takes an extra 29 minutes to calculate the pairing information, for the example below. The BAM file is 4 GB in size. > system.time(RNAreads <- readBamGappedAlignmentPairs(file)) user system elapsed 1852.16 59