Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-24 Thread Leonardo Collado Torres
note > attached to R-4.0.0 RC, but I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion. > > Gordon > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hervé Pagès > > Sent: Tuesday, 21 April 2020 6:51 PM > > To: Gordon K Smyth ; Martin Morgan > > ; bioc-devel@r-project.org >

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-22 Thread Gordon K Smyth
To: Gordon K Smyth ; Martin Morgan > ; bioc-devel@r-project.org > Cc: Yunshun Chen > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0 > > On 4/20/20 23:28, Gordon K Smyth wrote: > > Thanks, that does help. So it seems that R-4.0.0 will use > >

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-21 Thread Hervé Pagès
r-project.org Cc: Yunshun Chen Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0 Yes, all builds of R 4.0 and above are now using Rtools40 on Windows. See: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cran.r-2Dproject.org_bin_windows_Rtools_&d

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-20 Thread Gordon K Smyth
.5, but perhaps without any proper justification. Maybe Rtools4.0 > supports both the 4.0.0 and 4.1.0 pipelines. > > > > Thanks > > Gordon > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Hervé Pagès > >> Sent: Tuesday, 21 April 2020 12:01 PM >

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-20 Thread Hervé Pagès
M To: Gordon K Smyth ; Martin Morgan ; bioc-devel@r-project.org Cc: Yunshun Chen Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0 Hi Gordon, The Bioconductor version to be released (BioC 3.11) uses R 4.0, not R 4.1. The latest Windows built of R 4.0 is available on CR

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-20 Thread Gordon K Smyth
art()' for an HTML browser interface to help. > > Type 'q()' to quit R. > > > >> install("edgeR") > > Error in install("edgeR") : could not find function "install" > >> library(BiocManager") > > > > + > l

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-20 Thread Hervé Pagès
gsCIctSAMUxFFSy3MRDadA&s=k3mNrMHBrm7lJNPmek3Hxf9nhnh5wbosiLl_G07B2dg&e= ' Content type 'application/zip' length 3181389 bytes (3.0 MB) downloaded 3.0 MB package ‘edgeR’ successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked The downloaded binary packages are in C:\Users\smyth\Ap

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-20 Thread Gordon K Smyth
mpy8bFkk\downloaded_packages Old packages: 'backports', 'BiocFileCache', 'BiocNeighbors', 'BiocStyle', 'broom', 'dbplyr', 'foreign', 'GenomeInfoDb', 'GenomeInfoDbData', 'gtools', 'isoband'

Re: [Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-20 Thread Martin Morgan
The Bioconductor 3.11 builds transitioned in the last week to using the new tool chain, following CRAN's lead. As a sanity check (ours!) what makes you say > It appears that the Bioconductor developmental repository is using > rtools35 ? Martin Morgan On 4/19/20, 10:41 PM, "Bioc-devel o

[Bioc-devel] R-devel for Windows: Rtools3.5 vs Rtools4.0

2020-04-19 Thread Gordon K Smyth
Dear Biocore team, How is Bioconductor handling the transition to the new R for Windows toolchain? The R-Devel build for Windows currently available from CRAN uses Jerome Oom's new gcc 8.3.0 toolchain from rtools40, whereas R-Devel builds for Windows downloaded from CRAN a couple of months ago