Hi Avinash,
So the argument for the importance of reproducible research *definitely*
resonates with us here as it is a major goal of ours. However while the
decision to use the same library as your paper helps to make the
immediate work more reproducible, it simultaneously hampers others from
Hi Dan,
Now I have included source code of the rsampl.h in the GOAL package.
Although, rlecuyer is good candidate for random number generator, I
currently avoid using it because I wanted results of our submitted
manuscript to be completely reproducible. I can reproduce the results using
ransampl
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> However, you should consider using Rlecuyer as it has no external
> dependencies (see Levi's post to this thread). Then your package should build
> on windows.
I think so too - it's also a standard solution in R, implemented
natively in r-
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Morgan"
> To: "avinash sahu" , "Steve Lianoglou"
>
> Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 10:52:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Package submission with library requirement
e:
>>>
>>> See my comments below.
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>
>>>>> From: "avinash sahu" mailto:avinash.s...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> To: "Karim Mezhoud" m
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:16 PM, avinash sahu wrote:
>
> Both the libraries are not thread safe. Although boost random genrator in
> limited situation can be thread safe. I have tried them earlier they were
> failing with multi-threading.
I like the rlecuyer package for parallel random number gen
gt; am
> >>> somewhat novice in bioconductor. I am replying to your comments
> inline.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> See my comments below.
&
in bioconductor. I am replying to your comments inline.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> See my comments below.
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -----
>>>>
>&g
gt;> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum
>> wrote:
>>
>> See my comments below.
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>
>>>> From: "avinash sahu"
>>>> To: "Karim Mezhoud"
>>>>
.
- Original Message -
From: "avinash sahu"
To: "Karim Mezhoud"
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 7:50:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Package submission with library requirement
Thanks for mail Karim.
I have GOAL staisfies all guidelines.
However, G
: "avinash sahu"
> > To: "Karim Mezhoud"
> > Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 7:50:38 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Package submission with library requirement
> >
> > Thanks for mail Karim.
> >
&g
Yes,
just an error by copy/paste
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
See my comments below.
- Original Message -
> From: "avinash sahu"
> To: "Karim Mezhoud"
> Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 7:50:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Package submission with library requirement
>
>
Thanks for mail Karim.
I have GOAL staisfies all guidelines.
However, GOAL is not compiling in windows and because of its heavy
computational requirement its cannot be used with Windows.
Regarding third party code, bioconductor website mentions (i.e. ransampl):
"In cases where the external librar
Hi,
Before you submit your package, please make sure that it satisfies all our
guidelines here.
http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/packageguidelines/
Be sure that you tested it with the appropriate version of R. To work
out which version that is, please have a look at this site here:
htt
Hi all,
I am trying to submit a package (https://github.com/vinash85/GOAL) in
bioconductor. It requires a ransampl (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ransampl/) and gsl libraries already
installed in system.
The package is failing to install at automated package installer of
bioconductor (
http://b
16 matches
Mail list logo
