Hi Mike,
On 12/6/19 00:51, Mike Smith wrote:
> Thanks Hervé for documenting this, should be very useful.
>
> Do you think there's any merit in identifying if there are currently
> packages that take very close to the 40 minutes mark at the moment, and
> pointing this feature out to the maintainer
Thanks Hervé for documenting this, should be very useful.
Do you think there's any merit in identifying if there are currently
packages that take very close to the 40 minutes mark at the moment, and
pointing this feature out to the maintainers directly? I don't know how
tight for time the build p
Hello developers,
These builds were announced on this list in Nov. 2017 (see
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2017-November/012326.html).
The purpose of the "Long Tests builds" is to run tests that are too long
to run in the 40 min. allowed by the daily builds. With the Long Tests
bui
2 more things:
On 11/07/2017 02:10 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi developers,
In this recent thread:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2017-October/012154.html
some of you expressed the desire to be able to have extra/longer unit
tests in their package, with these tests being run on a r
Hi developers,
In this recent thread:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2017-October/012154.html
some of you expressed the desire to be able to have extra/longer unit
tests in their package, with these tests being run on a regular basis
by our build machines.
To address this, we've s
