Re: [Bioc-devel] Removal of Information in OrgDb generated from NCBI -- Feedback needed.

2020-04-30 Thread web working
Hi Lori, I agree with Michael. I for myself do not need the UNIGENE field. The mot frequent columns that I use are: ENTREZID, REFSEQ, ENSEMBL, SYMBOL, GENENAME, UNIPROT, gene_id and GO. Best, Tobias Am 30.04.20 um 08:46 schrieb Stadler, Michael: Hi Lori Just my two-cents: I would not miss

Re: [Bioc-devel] How to speed up GRange comparision

2020-01-29 Thread web working
laps(). > > Or pcompare(), which should be even faster. But only if you are not > afraid to go low-level. See ?rangeComparisonCodeToLetter for the meaning > of the codes returned by pcompare(). > > H. > > On 1/29/20 08:01, Michael Lawrence via Bioc-devel wrote: >&

[Bioc-devel] How to speed up GRange comparision

2020-01-29 Thread web working
Hello, I have two big GRanges objects and want to search for an overlap of  the first range of query with the first range of subject. Then take the second range of query and compare it with the second range of subject and so on. Here an example of my problem: # GRanges objects query <- GRang

Re: [Bioc-devel] How to use RData files in Bioconductor data and software packages

2020-01-16 Thread web working
LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] stats graphics  grDevices utils datasets  methods base other attached packages: [1] dummyData_0.1.0 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] compiler_3.6.1 tools_3.6.1    ya

Re: [Bioc-devel] How to use RData files in Bioconductor data and software packages

2020-01-16 Thread web working
because of lazy loading. On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:40 PM Pages, Herve wrote: On 1/9/20 13:00, web working wrote: Hi Herve, thank you for your detailed answer. I guess I have expressed myself unclear. The BED files were just examples for data I store in the inst/extdata folder. Based on t

Re: [Bioc-devel] How to use RData files in Bioconductor data and software packages

2020-01-09 Thread web working
s instead of RData files is the better solution here. My question is if my storage of the RData objects (or RDS objects) in the inst/extdata directory is ok for an Bioconductor package. Best, Tobias Am 09.01.20 um 15:45 schrieb Richard Virgen-Slane: > > I may be missing a point, but how a

Re: [Bioc-devel] How to use RData files in Bioconductor data and software packages

2020-01-09 Thread web working
rimentHubData package for more information about this. Hope this helps, H. On 1/9/20 04:45, web working wrote: Dear all, I am currently developing a software package (dummySoftware) and a data package (dummyData) and I am a bit confused in where to store my RData files in the data package. Here my

[Bioc-devel] How to use RData files in Bioconductor data and software packages

2020-01-09 Thread web working
Dear all, I am currently developing a software package (dummySoftware) and a data package (dummyData) and I am a bit confused in where to store my RData files in the data package. Here my situation: I want to store some software package objects (new class objects of the software package) in t

[Bioc-devel] Roxygen

2019-05-09 Thread web working
Hi together, I am struggling a bit with the roxygen function import. Do you know how to add the dplyr %>% functionality to a function without importing the hole dplyr package? This is my current solution: #' Return first 10 entries #' #' @param mtcars a \code{data.frame} object #' #' @import

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with documentation of setMethod with different signatures

2019-02-18 Thread web working
Rd files. Martin On 2/14/19, 4:08 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of web working" wrote: Hi, I am struggling a bit with a R generic function. I build a generic and set two implementations of the generic with two different signatures as input. Both implementations

[Bioc-devel] problem with documentation of setMethod with different signatures

2019-02-14 Thread web working
Hi, I am struggling a bit with a R generic function. I build a generic and set two implementations of the generic with two different signatures as input. Both implementations of the generic produce the same output but have a different input. During devtools::check() I get the following error:

Re: [Bioc-devel] ddply causes error during R check

2019-02-14 Thread web working
3636 2 6 122.28571 3 8 209.21429 where R recognizes symbols in the formula ~ as intentionally unresolved. The wizards on the list might point to constructs in the rlang package. Martin On 2/12/19, 2:35 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of web working" wrote: Hi,

Re: [Bioc-devel] ddply causes error during R check

2019-02-14 Thread web working
ecksrc.html > > . > > Mike > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 08:35, web working <mailto:webwork...@posteo.de>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am developing a Bioconductor package and can not get rid of some > warning messages. Dur

[Bioc-devel] ddply causes error during R check

2019-02-11 Thread web working
Hi, I am developing a Bioconductor package and can not get rid of some warning messages. During devtools::check() I get the following warning messages: ... summarizeDataFrame: no visible binding for global variable ‘name’ summarizeDataFrame: no visible binding for global variable ‘gene’ summa