Re: [Bioc-devel] Slow performance on scanBam

2014-05-20 Thread James Bullard
Hi Martin, Thanks for the fix, I'll check it out. jim On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Martin Morgan wrote: > On 05/13/2014 08:17 AM, James Bullard wrote: > >> Hi Martin, thanks for the quick response. The data is certainly >> shareable. Here >> is a link to

Re: [Bioc-devel] Slow performance on scanBam

2014-05-13 Thread James Bullard
: > Hi James -- I don't think there's anything in existence to make this > easier, but I'll expose something in the next 24 hours; is your data > shareable? There might be deeper things to be done for processing this > small-but-numerous style data. > > Martin > >

[Bioc-devel] Slow performance on scanBam

2014-05-12 Thread James Bullard
I've been dealing with some small bam files with millions of reference sequences leading to monster headers. As one might guess, this leads to pretty bad performance when calling scanBam. Right now, it takes a bit (27MB bam file, 16k alignments, 2.5 million reference sequences in the reference fas