Re: [Bioc-devel] R version dependency

Hi, You can even set 3.5 if your code working with that version of R, but BiocManager won't load the latest Bioconductor version (3.19) unless you have R 4.4. Cheers, Anatoly On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:57 AM Richard Heery wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wondering what we should now list as the R versio

Re: [Bioc-devel] Important Bioconductor Release Deadlines

It's a bit late, but I'll point out that the use of R-devel dates back 20y to the inception of the Bioconductor project. So this is the way it has always been. Of course, this is an argument of conservatism which is always dangerous, But at least it illustrates that this is not a small change to ma

Re: [Bioc-devel] R version dependency

If you're submitting a new package, you might be asked to set this to R (>= 4.4). At least it used to be that way but I'm not sure this is still enforced. Otherwise you don't need to do anything. Best, H. On 4/22/24 10:56, Richard Heery wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wondering what we should now li

[Bioc-devel] R version dependency

Hi all, I'm wondering what we should now list as the R version in the Depends section of the description file: the current version 4.3.3 or the development version 4.4? Cheers, Richard [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-pro

Re: [Bioc-devel] singleCellTK

Please try to push the change to fix the gvsa issue. We generally will only un-deprecate when we see a clean build/check report for at least the linux platform especially since the package has been failing for an extended period of time (since early December). ___

[Bioc-devel] singleCellTK

Hello, The package singleCellTK is currently slated for depreciation in Bioc devel (3.19). We have been actively fixing the dependency issues, mainly the underlying changes in Seurat update. We are fixing one last issue to be c