Re: [Bioc-devel] Pipeline management (and AnnotationData Packages version)

2016-06-21 Thread Elena Grassi
> We have been using snakemake (python-based, but essentially a domain > language) with some pretty nice results. Nextflow (groovy-based) and Toil > are another couple that I am watching closely. The Broad just released WDL > and associated executors. And common-workflow-language (CWL) is gai

Re: [Bioc-devel] poor performance of snpsByOverlaps()

2016-06-21 Thread Robert Castelo
Vince, thanks a lot for the example streaming dbSNP over the internet and how this is even faster than accessing the data locally. to me, this just confirms that the current performance of the SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP144.GRCh37 annotation package can be improved. Hervé will look at it and hopef

Re: [Bioc-devel] Survey on interactive visualization and Bioconductor

2016-06-21 Thread Hector Corrada Bravo
Hello all, We want to share results from this survey during developer day at the upcoming BioC 2016. We've had great participation but want to encourage those who haven't taken the survey yet to consider doing so in the next couple of days. https://umdsurvey.umd.edu/SE/?SID=SV_5bXhBBZ8cKY08yp T

Re: [Bioc-devel] Some granges() accessors broken in devel

2016-06-21 Thread Peter Hickey
I've no idea what exactly I did or how I did it, but I'd somehow ended up with some core packages out of sync. Fixed with BiocInstaller::biocValid() and following advice therein. Sorry for the noise. On 20 June 2016 at 21:26, Martin Morgan wrote: > On 06/20/2016 09:22 PM, Leonardo Collado Torres

Re: [Bioc-devel] poor performance of snpsByOverlaps()

2016-06-21 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Robert, Thanks for report this. I'll look into it. H. On 06/17/2016 09:53 AM, Robert Castelo wrote: hi, the performance of snpsByOverlaps() in terms of time and memory consumption is quite poor and i wonder whether there is some bug in the code. here's one example: library(GenomicRanges)