Re: [Bioc-devel] Request for comment metagenomeFeatures package

2015-08-04 Thread Vincent Carey
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Martin Morgan wrote: > On 08/04/2015 06:43 AM, Nathan Olson wrote: > >> We are starting to work on an infrastructure for annotation of 16S >> metagenomic >> sequencing datasets and would like your comments and/or contributions. >> Below are >> links to two github r

Re: [Bioc-devel] Request for comment metagenomeFeatures package

2015-08-04 Thread Martin Morgan
On 08/04/2015 06:43 AM, Nathan Olson wrote: We are starting to work on an infrastructure for annotation of 16S metagenomic sequencing datasets and would like your comments and/or contributions. Below are links to two github repositories: metagenomeFeatures and greengenes13.5MgDb. The metagenomeFe

Re: [Bioc-devel] vignettes with different builders in one package?

2015-08-04 Thread Martin Morgan
On 08/04/2015 03:06 AM, Vincent Carey wrote: Thanks for all input. Henrik's comments deserve to be in WRE or developer doc for bioc, IMHO. yes, was there any attempt to get something more in WRE? Martin On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: You can mix any type and numb

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bug tracking for packages

2015-08-04 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Witold E Wolski" > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" > Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 9:07:32 AM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bug tracking for packages > > > Everything smooth and documented. Just tried it out. OK. What I did > not see on t

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bug tracking for packages

2015-08-04 Thread Witold E Wolski
Everything smooth and documented. Just tried it out. OK. What I did not see on the instructions is that to track issues you need to reenable this feature in the project settings of your forked. Issue tracking is disabled for the read only mirrors. If it isn't there maybe it could be added. cheers

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bug tracking for packages

2015-08-04 Thread Michael Lawrence
Maybe the website needs a more obvious link to a guide on reporting issues (basically what Dan just wrote)? It could even have a form (preferably with type-ahead) that would let the user enter the package name, and it would forward the client to the appropriate place (new github issue, support site

Re: [Bioc-devel] Request for comment metagenomeFeatures package

2015-08-04 Thread Hector Corrada Bravo
Thanks Vince, I think we just fixed that: https://github.com/HCBravoLab/greengenes13.5MgDb/issues/1#issuecomment-127649449 Cheers, Hector On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Vincent Carey wrote: > very interesting development, we have several folks who will take a look. > > FYI > > %vjcair> R CMD

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bug tracking for packages

2015-08-04 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Witold E Wolski" > To: bioc-devel@r-project.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 5:28:55 AM > Subject: [Bioc-devel] Bug tracking for packages > > Bug/issue tracking needed. Does bioconducotor provides any for the > packages > hosted? > Do you want to repor

Re: [Bioc-devel] Request for comment metagenomeFeatures package

2015-08-04 Thread Vincent Carey
very interesting development, we have several folks who will take a look. FYI %vjcair> R CMD INSTALL greeng*b Bioconductor version 3.2 (BiocInstaller 1.19.9), ?biocLite for help Loading required package: digest Loading required package: tools Loading required package: utils Loading required

[Bioc-devel] Request for comment metagenomeFeatures package

2015-08-04 Thread Nathan Olson
We are starting to work on an infrastructure for annotation of 16S metagenomic sequencing datasets and would like your comments and/or contributions. Below are links to two github repositories: metagenomeFeatures and greengenes13.5MgDb. The metagenomeFeatures package contains two classes; mgDb, fo

[Bioc-devel] Bug tracking for packages

2015-08-04 Thread Witold E Wolski
Bug/issue tracking needed. Does bioconducotor provides any for the packages hosted? best -- Witold Eryk Wolski [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Re: [Bioc-devel] vignettes with different builders in one package?

2015-08-04 Thread Vincent Carey
Thanks for all input. Henrik's comments deserve to be in WRE or developer doc for bioc, IMHO. On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > You can mix any type and number of vignette formats in a package. What > vignette engine is used is solely specified by the > %\VignetteEngine{

Re: [Bioc-devel] vignettes with different builders in one package?

2015-08-04 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
You can mix any type and number of vignette formats in a package. What vignette engine is used is solely specified by the %\VignetteEngine{::} markup string. You don't need to specify this for the default Sweave format, but you can as: %\VignetteEngine{utils::Sweave} For your knitr vignette you'd