Hi Michael,
On 05/11/2015 05:35 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
Splitting stuff into different packages is good for modularity, but
tough on the mind of the user. What about having some sort of "meta"
package that simply loads the core infrastructure packages? Named
something simple like "Genomics"
Yea, good point, it should probably do that in the methods namespace.
Still, flowCore should probably just import(methods) for the sake of
simplicity.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Martin Morgan
wrote:
> On 05/11/2015 05:37 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
>
>> All S4-based packages should probabl
I'll write a patch... I'd have to anyway :-)
--t
> On May 11, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> The SummarizedExperiment class is being replaced with the
> RangedSummarizedExperiment class from the new SummarizedExperiment
> package. This is a work-in-progress and the name a
On 05/11/2015 05:37 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
All S4-based packages should probably have methods in Depends and imported
in NAMESPACE.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Josef Spidlen wrote:
Hi guys,
I just noticed the following:
Contents of my file x.R:
library("flowCore")
x <- read.FCS('te
All S4-based packages should probably have methods in Depends and imported
in NAMESPACE.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Josef Spidlen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I just noticed the following:
>
> Contents of my file x.R:
> library("flowCore")
> x <- read.FCS('test.fcs')
>
> Then running the following
Splitting stuff into different packages is good for modularity, but tough
on the mind of the user. What about having some sort of "meta" package that
simply loads the core infrastructure packages? Named something simple like
"Genomics" or "GenomicsCore".
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Hervé Pagè
Hi Tim,
The SummarizedExperiment class is being replaced with the
RangedSummarizedExperiment class from the new SummarizedExperiment
package. This is a work-in-progress and the name and internal
representation of the RangedSummarizedExperiment class are not
finalized yet. The main goal for now is
who determined that breaking this would be a good idea?!?
R> ?SummarizedExperiment
Help on topic 'SummarizedExperiment' was found in the following
packages:
Package Library
GenomicRanges /home/tim/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.2
SummarizedExperiment
Hi guys,
I just noticed the following:
Contents of my file x.R:
library("flowCore")
x <- read.FCS('test.fcs')
Then running the following from a command line:
Rscript 'x.R'
Outputs:
Error in object@description[["ORIGINALGUID"]] <- object@description[["GUID"]]
:
could not find function "checkAtA
