Hi Avinash,
So the argument for the importance of reproducible research *definitely*
resonates with us here as it is a major goal of ours. However while the
decision to use the same library as your paper helps to make the
immediate work more reproducible, it simultaneously hampers others from
On 01/30/2015 10:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Thanks for the quick fix. No need to be sorry. /Henrik
especially since the cumulative changes in R-devel are starting to make a pretty
reasonable difference to load times (and presumably other aspects) of S4-heavy
packages! Thanks Michael & Pet
Thanks for the quick fix. No need to be sorry. /Henrik
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Michael Lawrence
wrote:
> Just checked in the fix to R-devel. No more error, and the warning is also
> fixed.
>
> Sorry,
> Michael
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Henrik Bengtsson
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm post
Just checked in the fix to R-devel. No more error, and the warning is also
fixed.
Sorry,
Michael
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Henrik Bengtsson
wrote:
> I'm posting to bioc-devel, but I suspect it would end up on R-devel.
> Feel free to continue the thread there at any time.
>
>
> PROBLEM:
>
I'm posting to bioc-devel, but I suspect it would end up on R-devel.
Feel free to continue the thread there at any time.
PROBLEM:
$ Rscript --vanilla -e
"source('http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R');biocLite('BiocGenerics',
type='source')"
Bioconductor version 3.1 (BiocInstaller 1.17.5), ?biocLi
