Re: [Bioc-devel] writeVcf performance

2014-09-09 Thread Hervé Pagès
Ah, ok. I should have 'svn up' and re-tried 'R CMD check' before reporting this. Thanks and sorry for the noise. H. On 09/09/2014 03:09 PM, Valerie Obenchain wrote: Hi Herve, This unit test passes in VA 1.11.30 (the current version in svn). It was related to writeVcf(), not the IRanges/S4Vecto

Re: [Bioc-devel] writeVcf performance

2014-09-09 Thread Valerie Obenchain
Hi Herve, This unit test passes in VA 1.11.30 (the current version in svn). It was related to writeVcf(), not the IRanges/S4Vector stuff. My fault, not yours. Val On 09/09/2014 02:47 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi Val, On 09/09/2014 02:12 PM, Valerie Obenchain wrote: Writing 'list' data has bee

Re: [Bioc-devel] writeVcf performance

2014-09-09 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Val, On 09/09/2014 02:12 PM, Valerie Obenchain wrote: Writing 'list' data has been fixed in 1.11.30. fyi, Herve is in the process of moving SimpleList and DataFrame from IRanges to S4Vectors; finished up today I think. I fixed VariantAnnotation's NAMESPACE this morning but 'R CMD check' fai

Re: [Bioc-devel] writeVcf performance

2014-09-09 Thread Valerie Obenchain
Writing 'list' data has been fixed in 1.11.30. fyi, Herve is in the process of moving SimpleList and DataFrame from IRanges to S4Vectors; finished up today I think. Anyhow, if you get VariantAnnotation from svn you'll need to update S4Vectors, IRanges and GenomicRanges (and maybe rtracklayer).

Re: [Bioc-devel] should genome() be so complicated?/add genome report to GRanges show method

2014-09-09 Thread Hervé Pagès
OK so let's go for a 1 line summarization of the seqinfo. Vince is that OK if we keep this at the bottom of the object? That way it will always be visible, even when the object requires more than 1 screen to display (e.g. when it has a lot of metadata cols). Will look something like: > gr GRa

Re: [Bioc-devel] daily build system behind

2014-09-09 Thread Andrzej Oleś
Dear Levi, please note that experiment data packages are now build just twice a week, on Wednesdays and Saturdays. So no need to worry. Cheers, Andrzej On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Levi Waldron wrote: > I just noticed that the daily build systems are several days behind, eg for > experimenta

[Bioc-devel] daily build system behind

2014-09-09 Thread Levi Waldron
I just noticed that the daily build systems are several days behind, eg for experimental data packages: http://www.bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.0/data-experiment-LATEST/ Snapshot Date: 2014-09-06 06:15:22 -0700 (Sat, 06 Sep 2014) URL: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioc-data/trunk/experiment/pkgs

Re: [Bioc-devel] should genome() be so complicated?/add genome report to GRanges show method

2014-09-09 Thread Michael Lawrence
Agreed, that looks a lot nicer. On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Martin Morgan wrote: > On 09/09/2014 04:02 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > >> I'm in favor of this display. The seqinfo output at the bottom has always >> been annoying (over-emphasized). >> > > the fact that the lengths are 'NA' can

Re: [Bioc-devel] should genome() be so complicated?/add genome report to GRanges show method

2014-09-09 Thread Martin Morgan
On 09/09/2014 04:02 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: I'm in favor of this display. The seqinfo output at the bottom has always been annoying (over-emphasized). the fact that the lengths are 'NA' can be a helpful prompt to do something about it, e.g., add seqinfo when inputting the data. Also they a

Re: [Bioc-devel] should genome() be so complicated?/add genome report to GRanges show method

2014-09-09 Thread Michael Lawrence
I'm in favor of this display. The seqinfo output at the bottom has always been annoying (over-emphasized). On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Vincent Carey wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > >> On 09/08/2014 06:42 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: >> >>> Instead of print