On 11/06/2013 11:29 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
Great, thanks for updating. I legitimately wanted to use %in%, not %over%.
Great to hear you have a use case for %in% (with the new behavior). So
I'm not the only one ;-)
H.
Michael
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Hervé Pagès mailto:hpa...@
Great, thanks for updating. I legitimately wanted to use %in%, not %over%.
Michael
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>
> On 11/05/2013 04:30 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
>
>> I'm getting a little tired of this one popping up:
>>
>> In x %in% other :
>> Star
Hi Michael,
On 11/05/2013 04:30 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
I'm getting a little tired of this one popping up:
In x %in% other :
Starting with BioC 2.12, the behavior of %in% on GenomicRanges objects
has changed to use *equality* instead of *overlap* for comparing
elements between Gen
- Original Message -
> From: "Luo Weijun"
> To: "Dan Tenenbaum"
> Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 8:38:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Commit problem in the release branch Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 2.13
> branch created
>
> Dan,
> That works! Somehow, it always promp
Dan,
That works! Somehow, it always prompted me for username/passwd if needed in the
past,but not this time. Anyway, thanks!
Weijun
On Wed, 11/6/13, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Subject: Re: Commit problem in the release branch Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 2.13
b
- Original Message -
> From: "Luo Weijun"
> To: "Dan Tenenbaum"
> Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 8:18:22 AM
> Subject: Commit problem in the release branch Re: [Bioc-devel] BioC 2.13
> branch created
>
> Dear all,
> I just fixed some bugs in my pathvi
Dear all,
I just fixed some bugs in my pathview package. And would like to update my
release version (with Bioc 2.13) too. I checked out the release version, and
modified it. But I can’t commit the changes somehow. I did so for the 2.12
release version, it worked fine. Bellows is the error messa
On 11/04/2013 11:34 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
The dynamic nature of R limits the extent of these checks. But as Ryan has
noted, a simple sanity check goes a long way. If what he has done could be
extended to the rest of the search path (people always forget to attach
packages), I think we've hi
